Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.13.129.119 (talk) at 02:40, 4 August 2008 (Articles created/expanded on August 1: fmt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nayib Bukele
Nayib Bukele

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 30}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2024-11-30T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on August 4

Added some links. -74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why focus on the negative? --74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 3

Potato crisps with Zebra chip
Potato crisps with Zebra chip
ALT: *... that the potato disease Zebra chip (example pictured) has cost the Texas economy over US$125 million in lost business and threatens the same economic impact for New Zealand, which now suffers from import bans?
Suggest: "after" --> "for". --74.13.129.119 (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apt timing for this hook! Online newspaper reference verified, along with length and creation date. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
alternately, ... that, despite the company's claims, SummerSlam 1992 has the largest verified attendance of any World Wrestling Entertainment event? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go with second hook.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 06:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 2

Suggest linking to a wikipage which explains what the "Olympic truce" means. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 03:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That would be nice, but I don't think we have one, except for the foreign language versions such as el:Ολυμπιακή Εκεχειρία. Olympic Games has one sentence, and Ancient Olympic Games has two sentences. Art LaPella (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I could always simply expand that section of the ancient olympic games page, then; I know quite a bit about it. To be fair the article itself does have a bit of information about what the truce was but I'll expand the section in the AOG article when I have time (read: tonight). Ironholds 12:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article could be expanded, but I did not have the energy last night to do it. It would definitely benefit from some attention by native English-speakers, especially ones with some interest in the relevant subject areas. Hegvald (talk) 10:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't this hook a bit too tautological? --74.13.129.119 (talk) 03:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is that better, i.e., did you mean too many 'Aundhs'? priyanath talk 04:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Skaga stave church
Skaga stave church
Suggest: Commons:Image:Skaga stave church.JPG. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Need citation next to the cited fact, but otherwise, awesome article. Anyone who disagrees should be "kilt".--King Bedford I Seek his grace 01:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was cited at the end of the following sentence but I have split the ref in two so that is now fixed. Thanks for your kind remarks. Perhaps it is time for a Pictish-Confederate alliance to drive back the dark forces of the Romano-Yankee empire? :D Ben MacDui 09:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome career goal; I'm in. After all, the Confederate flag was based on the Scottish flag, and Robert E. Lee thought his best soldiers were the Scots-Irish. *laughs like a mafia don* --King Bedford I Seek his grace 16:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Huis ter Nieuwburg
Huis ter Nieuwburg
Glen Eira Town Hall
Glen Eira Town Hall
Related topic, but different articles.Beagel (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, you're right. I'm moving it back. Art LaPella (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the italics. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 03:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pico House, Merced Theater and Masonic Hall
Pico House, Merced Theater and Masonic Hall


Horand von Grafrath & Max von Stephanitz
Horand von Grafrath & Max von Stephanitz
Suggest: Commons:Image:Stephanitz.jpg.
AmeIiorate, if you don't want the image used on DYK, say so here. Admins here are usually very accommodating. But please don't remove the word "that" from the hook. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Clarence Thomas
Clarence Thomas
Suggest: Commons:Image:Clarence Thomas official.jpg (right). --74.13.129.119 (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on August 1

Drake Park Neighborhood Historic District
Drake Park Neighborhood Historic District
Sir John Jeremie
Sir John Jeremie
Suggest: Commons:Image:Sir John Jeremie 1795 1841.jpg (right). --74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest linking to Negro, Freedom (political) & Bias. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have put in links ... to anti-slavery and a definition for bias. Thanks for including the pic. I like it a lot Victuallers (talk) 15:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Hines
Thomas Hines
Let's drop the word "noted". If he's not "noted", he wouldn't have a wikibio. --74.13.130.4 (talk) 04:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So dropped.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 04:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thomas Hines
Thomas Hines
Pompone de Bellièvre
Pompone de Bellièvre
  • flood prone gay village, i like that a lot, even though i wanted to make a point of it being rural and gay friendly, your idea is a lot better and makes the place sound a lot more interesting, lets go with that!MYINchile 01:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! I keep pressing the point that less is usually more when it comes to hooks. Hooks that tease us with a single fact, or that are quizzical, or make us wonder how the story ends, are more effective than hooks that are mini-summaries because they make people want to click the link. - House of Scandal (talk) 07:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree, however I'm a little uncomfortable with this particular hook characterizing as it does a location as " very flood prone" and a "gay village". I would prefer to see a hook a little more neutral. Gatoclass (talk) 08:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry gatoclass but your comment makes no sense whatsoever. Making it more neutral in your preceding statement would seem to be not mentioning the gay life or the flood problems whatsoever which makes the whole hook unusable. Are you uncomfortable with gayness and floods or do you think that its not well cited enough? The Russian River area and Guerneville suffer from massssssive floods every decade or so and big ones every few years, and some flood of some kind annually, and the term gay village is the common term used on wikipedia for LGBT communities or neighborhoods. would you clarify?MYINchile 17:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although this is a gay-friendly resort area, the words "gay village" don't appear in the article. I suggest incorporating those words into the article using in-line citation if that can be done. If it can't, then let's leave the term out of the hook. Also, since the term is colloquial and subjective, and it's a label that some locals (right or wrong) might prefer the community not wear, quotation marks around it in the hook would be appropriate. If the article shows that flooding is well-documented, I don't see a problem with calling the place flood-prone. - House of Scandal (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • To perhaps shorten this and reduce the stark contrast of one to the other, I'd suggest removing the "flood prone" or the "gay village" label. Its slightly strange to have topics so unrelative that'd it be best to simplify the thread, as I think Gatoclass was getting at above. Rudget 19:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think that's was Gatoclass' point whatsoever. I believe Gatoclass' concern was that this hook might be seen as oppugning the community. The weird contrast of those two facts is the best thing about this hook. - House of Scandal (talk) 21:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Silver Appleyard Ducks.jpg
Exposition Park Rose Garden
Exposition Park Rose Garden
Wikified a bit. --74.13.130.4 (talk) 04:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can we assume that Bob Hope Chrysler Classic will continue to be expanded to a 5X increase in prose length? --74.13.130.4 (talk) 04:50, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could be other possible hooks as well.--Bedford Pray 16:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, and references verified. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 09:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook verified. Great job! Best, RyRy (talk) 09:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, and references verified. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 13:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, and references verified. Added "(pictured)" to the hook. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 08:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Carmel
Lake Carmel

Articles created/expanded on July 31

Harold Stark authored the Plan dog memo
Harold Stark authored the Plan dog memo
Go go offline references which use a book I have. Length, date, reference and picture are all good for the front page. Vickser (talk) 13:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Probably should mention Harold Rainsford Stark in this hook if we are using his picture. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Expanded article. Please re-review. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 09:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reworded...Thanks mate. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 20:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, how about this one, this is a shorter hook I think less than 200 characters, and states the same thing. **ALT:... that customization of video game vehicles was an aspect first introduced by the Need for Speed titles after the release of the 2001 film, The Fast and The Furious?--SRX 11:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC) (co-nom with User:ThinkBlue)[reply]
The main page has a general audience. A little more context is recommended. Please put in when and where and specify the currency in the hook. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 02:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have added currency but I feel that keeping the hook ambiguous will encourage people to click on it. ~ AmeIiorate U T C @ 06:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless I will add this ALT ... the pranksters behind the 1953 Martian Monkey hoax, in Atlanta, were fined US$40? ~ AmeIiorate U T C @ 06:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The original hook is much better. - House of Scandal (talk) 00:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Ralphs Grocery Store
Ralphs Grocery Store
or "... that at the Convention of 1836, delegates approved the Texas Declaration of Independence with no debate? Karanacs (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I think the second hook is more interesting than the first. Length, date and hook verified. Good job! -- RyRy (talk) 07:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you're already there for Tuvalu. Before your expansion started today, readable prose was 256 bytes; we're currently at 1,469 bytes. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The original hook appears to be incorrect, or at least misleading since there are really 3 first-timers. I think all three should be included, but reaching the 1,500 readable prose characters (which I think is met for Tuvalu) is going to be difficult for all three. So maybe the second alt is better? Mitico (talk) 22:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC) I have expanded all three articles to acceptable amount of prose, so the above alt hook should work (I think ). -Mitico (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An important role? Can you be any more specific? The article's also vague on exactly what its role was - did the negotiations take place there, was a particular bone of contention, or was it something else? Iain99Balderdash and piffle 18:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference confirmed. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 17:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues - not yet 1500 main article characters; otherwise ref checks out. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 03:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded it and clarified some areas. ~ AmeIiorate U T C @ 04:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-- confirmed. Good to go. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 07:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Princes Pier (Port Melbourne, Australia)
- length checks out; ref good. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 03:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Offline source good-faithed; five fold confirmed. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 03:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[[Image:Lemur11 edit.JPG|100x100px|right|a female Black Lemur]]

Suggest the use of Image:Lemur11 edit.JPG (right). --74.13.127.194 (talk) 04:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd recommend staying with the original image "Image:Eulemur macao flavifrons.jpg" in this case. "Image:Lemur11 edit.JPG" is probably a nicer general black lemur picture, but it is of the brown eyed subspecies, while the factoid specifically references the blue-eyed subspecies shown in "Image:Eulemur macao flavifrons.jpg". Rlendog (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that we should use the blue eyed lemur picture. I do think it needs to be cropped for the front page, though. As is there's too high a tree to lemur ratio. Vickser (talk) 12:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very good point. --74.13.130.4 (talk) 04:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A nice tight crop around just the lemur would look great as a thumbnail on the front page next to this hook. --Blechnic (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How does one go about cropping images from Commons? Are there instructions anywhere? Rlendog (talk) 01:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Category:Protected main page images#Instructions for administrators. {{M-cropped}} may be useful. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 01:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. So this is something the admin has to do? I thought I needed to do it. Rlendog (talk) 02:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and ref confirmed Iain99Balderdash and piffle 17:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is currently nominated for deletion, and thus ineligible. If it closes with a keep early enough it could still be featured, but my guess is that's unlikely. A car accident with no fatalities and nothing particularly special is unlikely to be notable. Vickser (talk) 13:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In case anyone wants to quickly go comment or vote: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Poole Harbour bus accident. --74.13.130.4 (talk) 04:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Length, hook verified. Good to go. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 06:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, I put that nomination in and it's approved 12 minutes later. :P Thanks, RyRy (talk) 07:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like baseball, your hook caught my eye ;) --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 07:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Basically the old thing I write is baseball. :P Look at this. Feel free to join WP:SOX. ;) Heh, heh. -- RyRy (talk) 07:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest "Ryan's" instead of "his". Otherwise, it could be Wilkins' debut instead of Ryan's. Art LaPella (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, Art LaPella, when you gave me that message, I thought it was something really bad about the article. :P Yes, at first I thought I should have used "his" instead of "Ryan's", but I see the problem. I have changed it. Thanks for the note, RyRy (talk) 06:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mutinus caninus
Mutinus caninus

Articles created/expanded on July 30

Length, date, hook's ref verified. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Hook's reference is a book with isbn, unavailable online, accepted per WP:AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. Hook's reference is a book with isbn, unavailable online, accepted per WP:AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Potentially contentious subject matter which has already raised objections on the article's talk page. I have notified Wikiproject Islam to take a look at this article so that its status can be properly determined before it is promoted. Gatoclass (talk) 05:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The objection on the talk page, which I'll shortly respond to there, is about the image - which is best available image depicting the person who is most relevant to the entire context of the article. Fine be a critic, but find us a better one. Go on. The hook is not unsourced. Count the number of male and female slaves for which each entry is carefully sourced. I find at least 33 males and exactly 15 females. The only thing that makes "contentious(ness)" relevant, is if the sourcing or definitions are unacceptable to any degree. Well, let's hear it then?? Put up, now.87.203.51.18 (talk) 15:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is more than one objection on the talk page already. I myself have a number of concerns about this article, which is why I notified Wikiproject Islam. But I'm prepared to wait to see what they have to say. Gatoclass (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On closer inspection, the article does not qualify in any case. Only about a x2 expansion of main body text. Gatoclass (talk) 05:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what you could be referring to there. I see the size was 4,857 bytes at 21:57 on

29 July 2008 thanks to attempted suppressions by User:Itaqallah. It reached 5 times that size definitely within 5 fulls days of that and now is 29,345 bytes and still going to be grown I assure you.87.203.51.18 (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, we only count the prose portion as described at #Instructions. Therefore the long lists of slaves and references don't count towards the total (neither the before total nor the after total). So Gatoclass was correct; the expansion was about x2 when he commented. A few minutes ago it was expanded up to x4. Art LaPella (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. The hook's source, a book with an isbn, is unavailable online but accepted per WP:AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date verified. The hook's source, a book with an isbn, is unavailable online but accepted per WP:AGF. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Félix Houphouët-Boigny
Félix Houphouët-Boigny
yes I did mean legal drugs ... I'm relying on the fact that others might assume he was a "drug dealer" rather than a pharmacist. OK? Victuallers (talk) 21:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK with me. Just making sure it wasn't an oversight. Art LaPella (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Albrecht Dürer
Albrecht Dürer
Had to remove some copyvio text here - see British Museum note. Johnbod (talk) 02:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article relatively new, length ok. But you have to point out where your hook fact corresponds with the sources. Lampman (talk) 03:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length verified; offline ref taken in good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Could the link at least try to point to the page in the book instead of the general page of info about the book? Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ref says page 53 and now points here - Victuallers (talk) 22:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially, this is fine: length has been expanded x5.6 today, and the 4,114 km fact is verified. However, this document, used for refs 3, 4 and 11–14, is currently a dead link for me. Also, I favour rewording to "does not operate any passenger trains", because it has a small fleet of shunters, maintenance trains etc. as per section 2.4. Once the pdf comes back up, I'll take a quick look and change to a green tick. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 20:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I found the pdf; the link was slightly wrong. This hook is ready, with the clarification mentioned above. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about the dead link—I had the file downloaded onto my computer. If people prefer, the term revenue train could be used, but I felt it is a bit too specialized terminology to go on the main page. Arsenikk (talk) 22:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 14:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tower Hill Water Tower, Ormskirk
Tower Hill Water Tower, Ormskirk
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues This isn't mentioned in the article. Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, it's in the lead. And referenced. Small-town hero (talk) 16:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, missed it; often these things are restated elsewhere in the article. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest: Commons:Image:Tower Hill Water Tower, Ormskirk.JPG (right). --74.13.129.119 (talk) 01:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
length OK; hook cited. --Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 22:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody who has seen Monty Python and the Holy Grail will find it very interesting. Daughter of Mímir (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While that would make an excellent hook, DYK is only for articles that are new or have been expanded fivefold in the past 5 days. The article on swallows has had neither, and is thus not eligible for DYK. Vickser (talk) 10:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The article is only 1441 characters, excluding references. Please expand it to at least 1500 characters. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded it some. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 11:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length confirmed. Ready to rumble. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues While the 51 52 fact is supported with an inline citation, there's no citation on the claim that the ships were later salvaged. Length and date do check out, though, and the picture is also free use and okay for the front page. While I'm commenting, great job on the article! It's thorough, well illustrated, and absolutely beautiful. Vickser (talk) 09:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arrrgh, you are of course right! I've greatly expanded the salvage section, with supporting refs and cites. There's some pretty impressive stuff about Ernest Cox, 'the man who bought a navy', used coal from the sunken ships to fuel his salvage engines, ordered one salvaged ship to be sunk again because he wasn't there to see it raised, etc. Also that the steel from the ships is still used to manufacture instruments like Geiger counters. If anyone wants to come up with a different hook, feel free! Thanks very much by the way, it turned into a bit of a labour of love. Benea (talk) 10:54, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should be all set now. I have to grey check since they're offline reference, but this should be good for the front page. Vickser (talk) 11:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, I've changed the number to 52 actually, as Massie has again blundered, and seems to think the SMS Bremse was beached not scuttled. The list of sources that contradict him is long and frankly embarrassing, but mea culpa for relying on him, and this can join the list of his many small errors. The other cited source, Dan van der Vat explicitly states 52 ships sank. Benea (talk) 11:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The books are offline and I'm not feeling up to a library trip, but I don't see any reason not to trust your judgement on this. My check stands. Vickser (talk) 11:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues While length and date check out, the article needs inline citations to be eligible for DYK. Here's to hoping this can get fixed up, as it looks like a pretty great article. Vickser (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the piping in [[Los Angeles, Chile|Los Angeles]] is somewhat misleading. --74.13.129.119 (talk) 01:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, and inline citation are all there. Offline source accepted on good faith. Vickser (talk) 08:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date check out, and the picture's freely licensed, but you need an inline citation for the hook immediately following the sentence, not just at the end of the paragraph. Fix that and you should be good to go. Vickser (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done with small correction - 3 sources. XLerate (talk) 10:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks perfect now. Vickser (talk) 10:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ajuga genevensis
Ajuga genevensis
Length, sources, date and second hook okay. The online sources are okay so I assumed good faith on the hook's source as it is unavailable online.--Lenticel (talk) 00:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date of creation verified; offline ref accepted on good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Castle Rock
Castle Rock

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on July 29

xFred Hardy is also listed at #Articles created/expanded on July 29, which is the date it was created. Art LaPella (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was created on 30th (by mistake I had added it to 29th and will remove it).
I struck out my X because Fred Hardy was removed from the 29th, so now the solution is to move it to the 29th, not to delete this version. And I'm not sure it even matters much any more, as long as we don't have a duplicate submission. However, the article was created at 21:37 July 29 UTC. I don't have much experience with this rule, but as far as I know, July 30 means July 30 UTC when no time zone is specified. By the way, I didn't suggest a version of the hook; my only objection is about the date. Art LaPella (talk) 23:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Objection with the date
Resolved
. Wikidās ॐ 04:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But the sources (#5 & #8) state that the quake in the desert in 1999 was a stronger quake than the 1994 Northridge quake. Hook needs refinement. Mitico (talk) 21:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Refined. Must eat worms (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article is currently tagged as a possible merge, and I added {{sections}}. Daniel Case (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Symbionese Liberation Army Naga Symbol.jpg
As the bomb was a dud, the police station could not have been "saved" -- it was never in danger. --74.13.127.194 (talk) 04:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps some context on exactly where the station is would be in order. — Bellhalla (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if the SLA logo is free for us on the main page. I'd assume the SLA would somehow hold the copyright. Do terrorists forfeit copyrights when they become outlaws? --74.13.130.4 (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The image history indicates this has been released into the public domain, and I really don't think a terrorist organization has a protected interest in a multi-headed cobra. I don't think this is a real world concern, and I think it's an eye-catching image that helps the hook, but if others see it as an issue, just use without the image. Cbl62 (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dispute solved now. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Hook needs an inline citation. Length and date are good to go, though. Vickser (talk) 09:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a source, hope it is good now. Tymek (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Polish POV once again, like the related Wawelberg Group article and DYK two months ago. The title was OR, as "Saint Anne's Mountain" is an invented name, as the de:St. Annaberg was in Weimar Germany. Polish terrorists attacked it, German forces liberated it again in the Battle of Annaberg, as it is known to English Scholars. -- Matthead  Discuß   22:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Matthead, please keep your personal opinions to yourself. And please stick to English names here. Thank you. BTW Saint Anne's Mountain has not been invented by me ([2]). Tymek (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Battle of Saint Anne's Mountain" was introduced to Google by this very en-WP article of yours, Tymek. It violates WP:NOR. -- Matthead  Discuß   10:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I second Tymek.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus, you once again did your usual moving, salting & taunting maneuver to prevent a move back, even though you've been warned several times not to do this.-- Matthead  Discuß   10:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also question the current title, "Battle of Saint Anne's Mountain". Olessi (talk) 03:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So should we use Polish or German? This is pointless; English is a good compromise.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, we do not compromise the well-sourced name Battle of Annaberg just to accommodate fringe views. Polish is no option anyway - why do you not mention Bavarian language, as also Bavarians took part in helping to defend Germany against Polish aggression? -- Matthead  Discuß   21:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dispute solved now, article moved. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
James Ludington
James Ludington
Length is fine and the hook is referenced. Seraphim♥Whipp 12:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded "Samuel Richardson" five times after removing redundancies, things that didn't belong in the page, etc. as per <script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Omegatron/monobook.js/addlink.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>&diff=228705849&oldid=228653406 here. Please credit User:Stratford490 for his help on both pages. Also, if it is not expanded far enough, I can update even more. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • While Samuel Richardson is a little iffy, I think the amount of new content meets 5x expansion and the The History of Sir Charles Grandison clearly qualifies. Offline ref accepted in good faith. AgneCheese/Wine 04:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Unknown Confederate Dead Monument in Perryville
Unknown Confederate Dead Monument in Perryville
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


OR:
  • In addition to several bare urls (see WT:DYK) article is not a 5x fold expansion being around 1969 bytes on June 4th and around 8345 bytes today. It would need to get closer 9845 bytes of pure article text to qualify. Billy, as a DYK regular, I would like to kindly ask you to be more diligent in verifying that your articles qualify before submitting them. This is your second nomination in a week (prev. Hico, Texas) that you've nominated that was ineligible. Please be more careful. AgneCheese/Wine 04:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mount Everest
Mount Everest
Length verified. I don't have the book which is used to reference the hook, but the fact is confirmed by ODNB anyway. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 14:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reference verified. Length is just a smidge short of 5x expansion being around 735 bytes in Aug, 2007 and around 3430 bytes today. A 5x expansion would be closer to 3675 bytes. AgneCheese/Wine 12:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Updated, as per request Please re-review. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prose section has now been expanded 5x Iain99Balderdash and piffle 19:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Changed wording ... the United States did not exist when Gondwana did. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Muleshoe shoe IMG 0395.JPG
A 22-foot muleshoe greets visitors to Muleshoe Heritage Center
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm ... the article seems to use other sources, too, so I'm not entirely sure what changes you want made to it? It Is Me Here (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a reliable source which can verify the statement of the DYK, something that's required for its acceptance. Mastrchf (t/c) 04:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What if I changed the caption to:
* ... that The Infected is a punk band, formed in 1993, from Lexington, Kentucky? It Is Me Here (talk) 15:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That hook is dull. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 28

Ananda Everingham
Ananda Everingham
Still 60 characters too short. Gatoclass (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Peace and Brotherhood Chapel at the Vietnam Memorial State Park in Angel Fire, New Mexico.
The Peace and Brotherhood Chapel at the Vietnam Memorial State Park in Angel Fire, New Mexico.
Turned photo caption into rollover text for space reasons. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would love to use it, but the cite is to a pamphlet that is likely to be promotional. Do you have a more reliable source, or maybe a different hook?--King Bedford I Seek his grace 21:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about this: *... that Vietnam Veterans Memorial State Park is the first only state park dedicated solely to veterans of the Vietnam War? 71.252.253.19 (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was the first major memorial of any type to the war, and is the only state park that exclusively memorializes Nam. The hook gets changed to reflect that, it gets my green check.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 21:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also