Talk:List of NC-17 rated films

Film List‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Would be interesting to mention on this page what is usually the impetus for re-rating a film. I assume it's always because the distributor wants to re-release a movie and perhaps get a wider audience, and never because the MPAA voluntarily decides to go back and review past decisions. Tempshill 23:59, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Breillat's Romance

I'm wondering if Catherine Breillat's Romance was ever given an NC-17 rating. The article on it says that an edited version was given an R rating, but doesn't say if the original cut was submitted to the MPAA. Robert Happelberg 20:42, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The MPAA's ratings database, filmratings.com, only lists an R-rated version, so the original cut was probably never submitted. (Also, I fixed the link to the movie in your comment; hope you don't mind.) —tregoweth 23:16, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)

- Thanks. Robert Happelberg 21:54, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Actally, it was originally rated NC-17. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.163.32.135 (talk) 17:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pulp Fiction?

As far as I know, this movie was never rated NC-17. The only source I could find supporting the claim was IMDb, which will print almost anything its readers send in and is very unreliable. --PenguinJockey 04:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unrated Films (UR)

Is there a page of unrated films on wikipedia???

Questions

1. Some of the films here (Eyes White Shut Perfect Blue) are not listed as being originally NC-17 or X in the main source. Should they be taken out?

2. Should Color of Night be on the list? The article o it says it was originally rated NC-17.

Bobisbob 04:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

This page is full of redundant wikilinks. If an article is linked to once, it does not need to be linked again. I will work on this some other time, unless someone else wants to fix it. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 03:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up until G. I noticed that a lot of the sentences were missing periods, so if I noticed it, I put them in, but I probably missed a lot. There are also several occurrences of years over and over again, but it is harder for me to remember which ones are there already and not. After I finish with this first sweep, I will come back and start over looking for those two things.

Well, that was a pain in the butt. I have gone through and gotten rid of most of the redundant wikilinks. What I need to do now is get rid of redundant years, wikilink a few movie titles and make sure that there are periods at the end of all of the titles. I will also be adding a tag for citations, as many movies are missing them. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 03:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All of the movies have wikilinks now. I will have to go through and make sure that they all link to the right article. Then I have to get rid of redundant dates and add periods to a few sentences. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clerks

Clerks does not fit into the description of films listed on this page. It was originally rated NC-17 but changed to R but the film was not recut. 172.131.248.55 (talk) 06:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This list is for films that were, at point or another, rated as NC-17, and may have been either appealed to R, edited down to an R, or released as NC-17. Clerks fits that criteria. Socby19 (talk) 18:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Groove Tube

Hello, i've read that The Groove Tube was originally rated X, does anyone know if this is true?