User talk:Soman

see: User talk:Soman/archive1, User talk:Soman/archive2, User talk:Soman/archive3, User talk:Soman/archive4

Thanks and sorry

Soman, Thanks for the help and sorry for the misunderstanding. Will post a public apology to you also in the discussion page. On.Elpeleg (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for creating articles about Nepal. Are you from Nepal? 202.70.64.57 (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is wrong with you?

the title of the "Iraqi-Israeli relations" article is RELATIONS! they have had relations even though they are bad! they may not trade with each other, but is Iraq trading with Saudi Arabia?? yet you dont have a problem with that article?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclefester89 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please use arguments to counter wp:undue and wp:point violations

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia.

Your test moveon the page Azad Kashmir / Pakistan occupied Kashmir has been reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page or introduction to editing to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your page move edit appears to be unconstructive and you have not used to used the talk page to counter the arguments.Further the edits that you reverted were well explained in the talk page unlike your edits. Hence, it appears to be an edit war with no logical backing to counter the issues discussed at the talk page. If you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative point by point rebuttal to counter the arguments on talk page and then please state the reasons for reverting to a "per se controversial" title (Azad Kashmir) that violates wp:undue and wp:point.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Thank you.Cityvalyu (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain in which article i have violated 3RR. --Soman (talk) 11:37, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NPsouthafrica.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:NPsouthafrica.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]