Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Boone

Procedural nomination; article was speedy deleted under A7 criteria, and subsequently contested at DRV. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 September 7 The deleting administrator has agreed to the deletion being overturned and the article being listed here for discussion. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 16:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Dealer and gallery central to 1980's art market. Found and promoted many important contemporary artists. I will expand the article and add references accordingly.--Knulclunk (talk) 19:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did a total rewrite. Feel free to expand.--Knulclunk (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there's enough here from which to build an article. TravellingCari 21:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 21:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 00:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep New York cover story, cited centrality to 80s art market and per Knulclunk and TravellingCari.John Z (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is without question. This article needs improvement and references, but there are plenty of those available. freshacconci talktalk 00:01, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with speedy keep. --Tone 07:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite/update/etc. If "notes" are meant to be "references" we need to list them as such but, there does seem to be enough out there to show notability and verify. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, seems to meet all the criteria. Stifle (talk) 09:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]