Talk:Safety of high-energy particle collision experiments
Appearance
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Safety of high-energy particle collision experiments. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Safety of high-energy particle collision experiments at the Reference desk. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Safety of high-energy particle collision experiments article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Physics B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication: Peskin, Michael (August 18, 2008). "The end of the world at the Large Hadron Collider?". Physics 1. vol. 14 |
To-do list is empty: remove {{To do}} tag or click on edit to add an item. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
REFERENCE LIBRARY (Click on the link to access the page)
Hawkings Thoughts
A cool interview with Stephen Hawking is on the BBC website right now: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7598000/7598686.stm
Worthy of inclusion? THMRK1 (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
False vacuum
Why is there no concern about false vacuum, while there was such concern with RHIC? --78.1.130.17 (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Not an expert, but isn't it a case of, if it was shown to be OK for RHIC, then must hold true for LHC, as the higher level energy isn't a factor? Khukri 16:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)