Talk:WWE New Year's Revolution
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WWE New Year's Revolution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Professional wrestling List‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Feedback
Here's somewhat of a feedback:
- Unlink the dates, per here.
- PWWEW.net might be a source problem, might be best to replace them.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
SRX
Here is my feedback.
- The history only talks about the bouts and matches at the event but nothing about the event's history in general, like it's name or things in that nature, it needs less about the matches and more about it's own history.
- I feel this will get shot down at FLC because the list is too short, what this could be made into however is a good article with more expansion on the prose like a reception section.
- For a thorough example see the FL, WWE No Way Out.
--SRX 23:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Nikki
I was coming here to mention the same issue that SRX brought up. In December 2007, WWE One Night Stand was nominated at FLC and failed because it was too short (see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/WWE One Night Stand). That article's list section was longer than this article's list section, so there is a good chance this one will fail for the same reason. I'm not telling you not to nominate it...I just wanted you to be aware of the precedent. Nikki311 17:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Also, Featured Articles/Lists are much stricter on sources, so it might be best to replace the PWWEW and OWOW. Since they only cited results (I think), SLAM! Wrestling would work as a replacement. Nikki311 17:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)