User talk:StarScream1007

Please add new topics at the bottom of this page.
Also please sign comments with a ~~~~.

Archives

Resident Evil

The "edits" being done by MR T are unorganized and disrupting the article placement on the page and deleting Characterized information Wehrmacht007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wehrmacht007 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry i beleive this is a "Character" article and how can 1 sentence discribe a character? Do you know what makes a "Character" a "Character"? And i've spent alot of my free time looking up the "Characters" story (The thing that makes a character a character) from many reliable sources and if anything you happen to be the one taking "Ownership" over this article after all everything i "Acuratly" state on the page happens to be delted by either you "StarScream1007" or "MR T". I'm adding "Character" in formansjon while you and MR T insist on deleting everything on the page i add disrupting the article placement etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wehrmacht007 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My god man what an idiot look it up yourself in a dictionary possibly Character and read that aloud to me and then tell me your wrong.

Madden NFL 09

I'd say the contribution I made was pretty neutral as it describes an even that is fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.50.139 (talk) 03:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B.O.W.s

Hi, I think you know more about what constitutes a reliable source for Res Evil articles, and was wondering if you'd have a look at this: B.O.W.s (Resident Evil). The article has only one source for its refs, and it looks a bit dubious to me. Would appreciate your opinion. Geoff B (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't think it was a reliable source, no, but wasn't sure. Do you want to get rid of it or shall I do the honours? :-) Geoff B (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silly of me to ask really... :-D Geoff B (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just here reminding you of that AFD! Geoff B (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:SA56474280 0b951b8c16.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:SA56474280 0b951b8c16.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:SA56474280 0b951b8c16.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 07:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your hangon comment, yes, that's true that CC licenses are irrevocable. Unfortunately, we have no evidence that the license was ever valid. I strongly suggest uploading flickr images to Wikimedia Commons. They have an upload page specifically for flickr images and if you use it, they will automatically be verified by a bot. You can even use Commons:User:Flickr upload bot to upload your image and the license will be verified right then. If the license is verified, then we accept it no matter what the flickr user does. But if it is uploaded here, we have no evidence that the license was ever valid and have no choice but to delete it. --B (talk) 14:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hester-gb.jpg

Never mind, found the correct source. Looks like a couple of photos had their sources scrambled. Kelly ^hi! 03:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Problem

I'll try to find the Robbie Gould reference. I've seen it I'll show u after i find it.

TP Page

I just want to say, thanks a lot for your help with this guy.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 03:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are being arrogant the complete REASON youtube is reliable is BECAUSE people can post whatever they want if i was saying "Midna and Link are in love youtube is proof" then you would be onto something but wat im saying is "Some Zelda fans BELIEVE they are in love" you need to stop vandalizing that pageDarkest-Link33 (talk) 14:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Erik[reply]

Oh ya and something i found kinda funny you would take off the Midna part and her source but keep the Ilia part which has the same source.Darkest-Link33 (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Erik[reply]

I have not vandalized the page so stop already im protecting it from it being vandalized by youThetriforcehero (talk) 23:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Austin[reply]

then theres you who has 5 accounts lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetriforcehero (talk • contribs) 01:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something funny I thought you'd enjoy, from a post to the Midna talk page:

But just to humor you:

Google Search for "Link loves Midna": 57300 results

Google Search for "Link loves Ilia": 246000 results.

Sooo...uh...how the hell are you getting the idea that LinkxMidna is the most popular?Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shadow Jester - quick thing about the Chad Johnson bio

Shadow Jester:

I changed C.J.'s bio back to his being born in L.A., because that's what his NFL bio says his birthplace his, and that's what I heard people in L.A., ESPN, and Fox Sports all say on various different occasions. I think his personal bio cites Miami as his hometown, but not his birthplace.

I could be wrong about this, of course, and if you happen to have better information verifying he was born in Miami, then by all means, please feel free to correct my mistake.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.202.20 (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darkest Hour

The interview link with Mike Schleibaum fits within the external link guidelines laid out by Wikipedia.

71.60.90.30 (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)72.22.6.209[reply]

tell me, what makes one website "official" as opposed to another? why is it that the external links page of wikipedia clearly states that

What should be linked

3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS, or online textbooks) or other reasons. 4. Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and INTERVIEWS.

71.60.90.30 (talk) 20:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)71.60.90.30[reply]

so what you're saying basically is that...just because something doesn't violate a policy and adheres to the rules and ramifications, it may still be incorrect? can you show me where exactly this is documented? is this just unspoken etiquette?

"yes, even though the external link guidelines suggest this link belongs here, it doesnt"

71.60.90.30 (talk) 21:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)71.60.90.30[reply]

July 2008

When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You Tube

As you are probably aware, You Tube has recently come under fire in respect of its use of copyrighted works, because of this a review of You Tube linking from enwiki is under way.

It is noted that you linked to a number of You Tube videos from your user page. Sadly the (C) status for some of those video is doubtful or unclear. In general linking to material whose (C) Status is ambiguous, unclear or unconfirmed is highly discouraged on Wikipedia as reflects badly on both the project and the contributor.

If you are not the copyright owner in respect of the videos linked (including any music, screen-shots or computer generated content), please consider reading both (WP:EL) as well as You Tube's Terms and conditions.

If you don't own the copyright to the footage in entirety you should NOT upload it on You Tube either.

If you are indeed the copyright owner in entirety for the linked videos, please confirm this (via OTRS or appropriate means) for each and every video linked, and mention this in respect of the link(s) concerned. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metalocalypse episodes

I've read it and I'm going to improve the Metalocalypse episodes\ articles with more useful information later. Right now I'm just creating the articles so people know they exist and might help me imorove them. Do not redirect them.User:N.Flen

WHAT!?!?!?!?

What's so "unsourced" about the Rich Harden Cubs image? I sourced it! A link back to the page that I got it from.

Plus, that image is clearly outdated, it's him in an Oakland Athletics uniform. Since he's a Chicago Cub now, he needs a Cub image in his page. Get back at me please. Silversword55 (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madden NFL 08

The stuff I erased had nothing to do with Madden at all so why are you getting mad? IF you actually read what I erased it was something stupid that someone put on there and was useless, so take off my warning or whatever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.67.73 (talk) 20:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dethklok

Nice work! We really cut the fictional side down to what it should be! ThuranX (talk) 18:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, 47K. what makes you think I'm NOT a deletionist? I am. I just deleted all the stuff that any good deletionist would object to. the article's now far more balanced than before, thoug hI suspect a lot more real world content about the real musicians and creators could be added. ThuranX (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please review my argument for redirect to avoid forking on the talk page there. thank you. ThuranX (talk) 21:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did read many of those before. Look I also read many character articles that were not perfect but were good enough to stay. So that's what I did I took the information of the characters that was deleted and put it into articles that were well enough written and organized to stay in wikipedia without being deleted. A lot of people will read the articles and try to improve them and update when is necessary. An article doesn't have to be perfect once is created that's why is put in wikipedia the edit free encyclopedia. Please give these characters a chance. I think you can agree that is better for them to have their own pages rather overcrowding one page. Besides it wold be sad that supporting characters get greater coverage than them. Look I think as of now the articles have some flaws but they are good enough for Wikipedia. User:N.Flen

But doesn't that ruin the point of Wikipedia.User:N.Flen

rick monday

I did site it but somehow didnt work. give me a few mins I will do it again.... its relavent and we all know it happened. I just dont know where the right place for that isWjmummert (talk) 23:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that sorry and thanks. Hey, any thoughts on Baseball Bugs and the loveable losers quote.... I am against it. Its already mentioned in Fall of 69 section.

home runs

hey i dont want that section to get too long, but if you have any others, you know what to do. i really dont know if that section is in the right place. any thoughts? Wjmummert (talk) 23:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE undo my last edit. Please also end my suffering.

Shadowjester

I weep for thee, o jester in the shadows. Dreaming now of whence we meet again. Rest well, sweet jester.... spooge often.... forever sleep.Wjmummert (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found Shadowjester07 uncharacteristically absent from the Resident Evil 5 article these last days. I only just now noticed you changed your name. Good to see you're still around. :-) --Atlan (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UNREAL

I just sold Billy Williams' daughter a Mazda 3 and had a 20 minuite talk with him. WOW!!!! Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 17:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Hunters

Sorry about removing your tag, but had you waited more than 2 seconds I was going to put it back. I didn't realize I deleted it. I just deleted all the GHI bullshit like "Brian left the show!" just becuase he missed half of one episode doesn't mean he's gone, and I'm sick of those who draw their own conclusions without verification. Plus what happens on GHI should be on the GHI article not here. Also, headers only have the first letter capitalized unless of course there is a name or title in the header. So it should be Season one, Season two, etc. Thats the way I've seen it done. Cyberia23 (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resident Evil 5

I understand there is no official citation from Capcom that refers to Sheva as African despite the way she looks as well as her African accent but as I have mentioned on the discussion page there has been no “official” citations that makes it more valid for Chris Redfield to be labeled white or Caucasian. If no official citation to Chris Redfield being Caucasian can be found would you then feel it would also be valid to remove the label from the Article? Siddhartha21 (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donovan McNabb references

I have again removed the refimprove tag from the Donovan McNabb article. The article has 14 references already, which probably puts it in the 95th percentile of references per article, and no explanation is offered as to what references need to be improved. While every single article on Wikipedia would benefit from better referencing, applying the tag without labeling and identifying your specific issues of concern is not likely to address your issues. I would suggest that you label the specific items that require sources and elaborate on these issues on the article's talk page. Alansohn (talk) 18:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Maddux

i made changes that will happen. If he gets traded im gunna be pissed as hell man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slyordie (talk • contribs) 18:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ChicagoCubs Project invite

Please accept this invite to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago Cubs, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles related to the Chicago Cubs. We hope you can join and contribute greatly to the project.

Dancey2 (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CHICAGO

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Brian Urlacher, Michael Barrett (baseball), Devin Hester, & Rex Grossman) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resident Evil Characters Page

Same to you please do not claim ownership over pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wehrmacht007 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge problems

I wanted to point out some possible problems with the merge proposal you made. For instance on the page for Airazor, this article is covering three different characters named Airazor, only one of which was in Beast Wars. The other two were in Transformers: Armada and Transformers: Timelines. Also, the Beast Wars character appeared in other series besides the Beast Wars TV show, she appeared in comics, text stories released by the company, etc. If anything you might want to merge the opposite way, and make the "list of beast wars characters" a simple list with links, and remove any pictures from it, merely linking to the main articles which are more detailed. No need to deplicate information that's already on the main pages for the fictional characters. Mathewignash (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then I propose that the page List of Beast Wars characters be merged into the various pages that it draws info from. Mathewignash (talk) 09:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the List of Beast Wars characters page duplicates the information on the other pages for Airazor, Cheetor, etc. Maybe it should be narrowed to a simple list and all the information about the character be on the pages for those characters. Mathewignash (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Urlachergc.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Urlachergc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've also tagged Image:Terrel Owens book.jpg with a dispute tag. Thx. --Mosmof (talk) 03:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant to do this in a single sitting, but I kept getting distracted - two more images are listed for WP:NFCC issues: Image:Ajvsbarr.JPG and Image:CaseyUrl.JPG. Thanks and apologies for the multiple messages. --Mosmof (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BrianUNM.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BrianUNM.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —teb728 t c 19:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anya-mug.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anya-mug.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page-Protection for Ghost Hunters

I requested semi-protection of Ghost Hunters because of the IP Vandal's persistence. They were blocked already, but just came back and started it again. Requesting either indefinite IP block or semi-protection for a few days. Hopefully the vandal gets a clue. Cyberia23 (talk) 04:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's protected now. 10 days. Cyberia23 (talk) 06:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I see he tried to add stupid comments to my discussion entries - to make it look like I'm the one talking shit now. I reamed him out on his talkpage the other day saying no one care that he hates the show and Wikipedia isn't for posting personal opinions, so he's targeting me now. Which is just too funny. Cyberia23 (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

?

Where this consensus? LUCPOL (talk) 12:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I asked: where consensus for making redirect in article Rapcore [1], [2]? LUCPOL (talk) 18:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shawne Merriman

I removed the image of Shawne Merriman on his page because it is rather pointless to have a picture from the backside of him. You may want to upload one where you could see his face, if you could obtain a picture from the same source.IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 02:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE5: Source Info

This IGN article clearly identifies Chris as an agent of the American branch of B.S.A.A. and Sheva as an African born agent of the West African branch. http://ps3.ign.com/articles/887/887351p1.html Yamagishi (talk) 03:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem and you're welcome. Yamagishi (talk) 03:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dream season

not that i really care now, but dream season? is not pov if it has a question mark. btw great game tonight. i got to see a no no live!!!! Wjmummert (KA-BOOOOM!!!!) 02:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs a cleanup

Starting with your plagerized picture up top that you ripped off anther user. Go outside sometime and leave the maddencurse page alone. I have a source for the curse, I just don't know how to link it. Back in the olden days of Wikipedia, instead of slamming the undo button, they would put a notice that the page needs some sources. Nor3aga (talk) 07:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also I read you'bio' and I must say it was the worst 2 minutes of my life. I want my time back. You are by far the least interesting person I know, and you should try to stop glamorizing your pithy existance you call a life good sire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nor3aga (talk • contribs) 07:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madden Curse

Vince Young should be added to the list. As for finding an article that STATES he was injured/replace BECAUSE of the madden curse, get out of here. Just because the ESPN article doesn't mention the curse doesn't mean he wasn't cursed. He should be included. I did the research, and found two things out: 1) Vince Young was on the cover. 2) Vince Young came into some weird trouble. The curse lives. Don't vandalize that page and remove the vince young part or I will report you to a moderator. Nor3aga (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SAUSAGE BISQUITE

OH YOU BET BE BELIEVIN' I REPORTED YUO. HAVE FUN NI YOUR ONE WAY CANON TRIP TO TH ESUN! BURNNor3aga (talk) 06:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)PS CONSESNUS DOESN'T OUTWEIGH FACT THIS IS A BIG THING THAT YOU GYS NEED TO GET OVER.[reply]