This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Comrinec (talk | contribs) at 20:46, 19 September 2008 (←Created page with 'Recently Greenpeace used this defence to justify damage to a coal powerplant to prevent environmental damage and were acquitted by the jury. Thought this is a notab...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Recently Greenpeace used this defence to justify damage to a coal powerplant to prevent environmental damage and were acquitted by the jury. Thought this is a notable case for some to add to the article.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/11/activists.kingsnorthclimatecamp Comrinec (talk) 20:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
