User talk:ABF

Präambel Trolle!Hier nicht! Trolle!Hier nicht! Trolle!Hier nicht! This is the talk Page of ABF. Please be friendly Old diskussions are in the Archiv1 Pleasee give a good headline by using == Headline == Sign by using --~~~~

User Ajjay & vandalism

Hi, yes I noticed your reversion edits, I would like to express that Ajjay has already had one serious warning for vandalism and colluding with others in non-English who are politically motivated, to have me blocked - anything I type seems to be erased by him ??

I will present you more of his vandalism —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.244 (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Ajjay only removed some non-sense edits of your IP. He was completly right. abf /talk to me/ 13:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you be more specific on non-sense (thanks) I provided the link for reference:

[1]

If the above link is nonsense, please let me know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.244 (talk) 14:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

This user removed a link, from the same source in a particular article [2]. He uses links where it suits his pov and rejects where it does not.ThanksAjjay (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

3RR note for User Rtrace

Hi.

You left me two notes regarding the 3RR and the article King Solomon's Mines. However, I am a little unclear of what you meant by the second note. WP:3RR states that reverting "simple and obvious vandalism" is an exception to the 3RR. I believe that the edits that I reverted [3], [4], [5] and [6] all constituted vandalism and my edit summaries reflect that. Given that reversion of vandalism is an exception to the 3RR, I'm not sure how I should have been more careful, as you noted in your second message. Is there something I should have put in my edit summaries to make it more clear as to what I was doing? Thanks.--Rtrace (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Oups, sorry, I overead this clause when I read rhe policy some days ago. abf /talk to me/ 19:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

A message from WarthogDemon.

Korean Fir I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with 61 support, 25 oppose, and 4 neutral. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^

My RfA

I can has mop?

Hi ABF! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3). I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Reversions

I saw your message on template welcomevandal, and I've reverted it back as I believe it was a constructive edit.--79.73.54.135 (talk) 09:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Why? In my eyes you only removed auto-singature without any reason. Can you please provide a reason? Maybe I am wrong. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 09:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Your message

Is there a way to make people sort out the layout properly? A tag or something? Thanks 127.0.0.1 (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I am not shure how it is here on enwp. On de: there is a quality-save-system. However yust writing "This is bad" on the top of an article is not the way. Try to ask at the Wikipedia:Help desk. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 13:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou, I found it. Wikipedia:Template_messages/Cleanup is what I was after. Thankyou again. 127.0.0.1 (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out to me :) abf /talk to me/ 13:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Reverted entry for Yokosuka Naval Base

Can you please clarify why my revision was reverted. The article for Yokosuka Naval Base has no pertinent information, and is redundant, as the article CFAY covers the history and current information about the base, which is actually called CFAY. The revision I made was a redirect to the CFAY entry. Pinkyviolence (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, seemed as if I had got the wrong buttom. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 18:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

So can I change it to a redirect again then? Pinkyviolence (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I did yet. Sorry again, abf /talk to me/ 18:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR violation

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User_talk:Cunard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Edit war with 64.230.4.19 Pinkyviolence (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Please read before adding templates. this says I am allowed to revert obvious vandalism. And telling someone "fuck you" is for me obvious vandalism! abf /talk to me/ 06:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, so NOW you're an expert on the 3 revert rule. You sure weren't when [7] happened. So fuck you. Pinkyviolence (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, yeah, I was not at that time. And can you please log in or stop using other users signatures, please? abf /talk to me/ 06:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

LOL! Look at his userpage, it actually tricked someone! :D64.230.7.84 (talk) 06:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)