Jump to content

Talk:Cent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bradkoch2007 (talk | contribs) at 12:16, 24 September 2008 (Undid revision 194209302 by 64.150.64.14 (talk). Reason: vandalism.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconNumismatics Disambig‑class
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DisambigThis disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The formula I've given here for working out cent values is correct, but I'm sure there must be a nicer way of displaying it - can anybody make it look pretty? --Camembert

sadly, not yet. There has been a sugestion on the mailing list to implement nicer formulae. I keep meaning to being itup again, but seeeing as we an't even agree ona simple change of URL... -- Tarquin 19:09 Oct 21, 2002 (UTC)

I'm not a mathematician, but I have my suspicions that the formula I added for musical cents, ie:

    1200 log(a/b)
n = -------------
       log(2)

Is equivalent to n = 1200 log2(a/b). Am I right, and if I am, would it be better to change the formula to read that, or leave it as it is so that people can do the sums on their pocket calculators without having to know how to change bases? --Camembert


Yes, it's right (Logarithmic Identities). Put both formulae in.  :-) -- Tarquin