Talk:Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Comedy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spoiler Warning?

How about adding a spoiler warning to the article? I just had to movie destroyed, thanks alot wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.235.204.180 (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does say "Plot".... if you didn't want to know about the film, you shouldn't of looked at it's profile......71.115.17.228 (talk) 02:07, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Morrisson

Anybody else think that this movie is in many ways a spoof of my shaved dick's droors as well as Walk the Line? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.226.25.215 (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Rename and move to Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story? Mahanga^Talk 03:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

walk stall.

The commercials include the lyrics:

"In my dreams, you're blowing me.........................some kisses."

Thank You,

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 03:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a need for a spoiler warning in the plot section?--Jdesouza00 (talk) 08:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cite(s) for use

Finish up.

Expand more on the entire plot, otherwise this section should be considered a summary. The Trivia paragraph does not belong here, and needs some serious cleaning up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wycked (talk • contribs) 00:54, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Full frontal male nudity

Can somebody add that this film has several scenes of full frontal male nudity? When it appeared in the movie I was completely shocked and disgusted. I believe that there should be some kind of warning. Maxtro (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting that the full frontal female nudity seems perfectly acceptable, but the male nudity brings about reactions like this. The way I see it, as it is stated that "nudity" (note: without gender) is one of the reasons the MPAA rated this movie R, the viewer should be prepared for nudity of any sort. Differentiating between female and male nudity in this respect represents a gender bias. --Gooseage (talk) 04:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gender bias indeed, though if female genitalia were so predominantly displayed the MPAA would have issued an X rating. The fact that a woman has to spread her legs to show as much a man does by simply standing means that the full frontal nudity in this film can be as jarring as a woman spread wide using both hands to pull her labia aside and fully display her clitoris. The gender bias is yours and the industry's Goosage, not Maxtro's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.122.170.66 (talk) 17:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More ways than one?

The article says that "His attitude and drug problems cause him to become unfaithful to his first wife Edith in more ways than one." The last few words of this sentence seem like a "teaser" remark designed to stir up curiosity while obviously and deliberately leaving the information to satisfy that curiosity. That approach seems more appropriate for an advertisement than an encyclopedic article. I suggest either deleting the words "in more ways that one" or rephrasing to provide the missing information. -131.107.0.73 (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]