Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.hack/SIGN
Appearance
Grammar is abysmal, organization is abysmal, topic already exists under the CORRECT title (.hack//SIGN), and the information given is purely redundant when compared with the actual topic. Merge would be pointless and a waste of time. - Zenithan 01:00, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Dude, just Redirect to .hack//SIGN. There's no point in deleting the page outright. Nifboy 01:12, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect For future reference, you should feel to redirect pages like this to the correct entry. There is no harm in having a redirect, and people might search for the incorrect "spelling". In general, its not necessary to bring this here. Be bold! --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 01:19, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect, it does not seem to be useful for a merge, and one slash could very well be a typo. -- ReyBrujo 01:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)