Talk:Randy Pausch/GA1
GA Review
Check 1
I am checking that the article meets a few basic things listed at Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles before I do an in depth review:
- The article has sources.
- The article is not clearly POV
- The article has no cleanup banners .
- The article doesn't seem to be the subject of any major ongoing edit wars (there was a dispute a couple of months ago but that seems to be completely resolved)
- The article doesn't specifically concern a rapidly unfolding current event without a definite endpoint
Anonymous101 (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Check 2
Issues:
- Per WP:LEAD, I think that the lead should be at least two paragraphs long. Anonymous101 (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
*I have added several {{fact}} tags to the article. Please provide verification for these facts. Anonymous101 (talk) 15:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)