Talk:EST and The Forum in popular culture

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EST and The Forum in popular culture article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

EST and The Forum in popular culture has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 22, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed
November 22, 2025	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of highly sourced material is inappropriate

Regarding removal of highly sourced material, multiple entire subsections in fact, by FreedomByDesign (talk · contribs) is highly inappropriate. This article has gone through a WP:GAC review, and was successfully listed as a WP:GA, it has also had a peer review. Please do not remove sourced material from this article. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 04:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, removal of large portions of sourced info from this article by FreedomByDesign (talk · contribs) after it has gone through several reviews, without consensus is inappropriate. Please discuss nonconsenus changes of removal of whole subsections of sourced info on the talk page. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 13:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate external link

I removed a link to someone's personal blog, not appropriate on Wikipedia -- Please see WP:LINKSTOAVOID -- 11. Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority. Also, this blog does not have to do with est and The Forum in popular culture, but rather non-fiction, historical accounts. Cirt (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice re Checkuser case

A recent checkuser case resulted in "confirm" on several users as sockpuppets of each other, that edited articles on closely related topics including Landmark Education, Werner Erhard, Landmark Education litigation, Scientology and Werner Erhard, Erhard Seminars Training, and Werner Erhard and Associates, among others. As a result, several of these users and sockpuppets of each other have been blocked. The checkuser case page is here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eastbayway. Cirt (talk) 15:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]