User talk:Canada-kawaii

Go ahead, complain about my rampant edits of the Vorarephilia article. Peace deals may be negotiable.

Ok. :3 Bawlix 01:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Canada-kawaii 01:44, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No XD Bawlix 12:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed 'List of paraphilias'

I appreciate that you don't like the idea of merging Vorarephilia into a larger list, but you should consider that this is probably the best way to prevent the article being deleted. As it stands, we haven't enough information to make Vorarephilia much more than a dictionary definition, which isn't really appropriate for Wikipedia. Although I think that the article (more specifically, the information in the article) does belong somewhere in Wikipedia, it is also a valid opinion that the article as it stands ought to be deleted.

Please realize that merging is not a permanent operation--if and when enough verifiable information is available to expand the article beyond a few sentences, it can be unmerged. Until then, though, merging is not a bad solution.

If you have any suggestions for a better way to handle a merge, then I will be happy to hear them; I hold no illusions as to my article-writing ability. I hope that we can come to a conclusion that is satisfactory for all of us. --Sopoforic 17:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about using IAR in an unusual way? Canada-kawaii 14:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Canada-kawaii/wow!

User:Canada-kawaii/wow!, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Canada-kawaii/wow! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Canada-kawaii/wow! during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Solumeiras (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is for archive purposes only. Wikipedia should have an archive, and that's what I'm doing. Canada-kawaii (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Human

Good one. Although I'm almost tempted to vandalize it by moving the status of humanity to threatened :) I wonder what it would be like if that were true... hmmm... as if we would be sitting around editing Wikipedia! Keep up the good work. Okiefromokla ^questions? 05:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lolololol! Canada-kawaii (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 9/11

You may not be aware of this, but in a 2008 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor working on articles concerning the September 11, 2001 attacks. This is something you need to be aware of, if you were considering continuing the back-and-forth reverting that's been going on at September 11, 2001 attacks. Your suggested alteration is unlikely to get consensus support, and the source you provided does not meet our guidelines for reliable sources. If any of this isn't clear, or you have further questions, please ask on my Talk page or at Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks. Thanks SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 13:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this your only warning. -- VegitaU (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I guess the consensus is that al-Qaeda claiming responsibility is sufficient evidence. Canada-kawaii (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Furry fandom

Hi - could you participate in discussion of page replacement on Talk:Furry fandom please ? --Oscarthecat (talk) 13:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving an article

Generally, it's a good idea to request a move instead of just moving an article yourself (unless you are absolutely sure that no one will oppose it anyhow). You can do so at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Just #Requesting potentially controversial moves|follow the instructions there if you want to move a page. Feel free to ask me here or on my talk page if you have any further questions. --Conti|✉ 13:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]