Talk:The Cat in the Hat (film)

Film Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Anti-Semetic???

How could this have been anti-semetic? There's no explanation. --Jnelson09 23:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is bad as hell.

I agree, and very one-sided as well Naysie 08:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you guys too-terrible article. How the hell is a woman in her underwear a mature theme btw? For crying out loud-there's tons of male content like that in Y7 cartoons... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.192.111 (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reaction

the last line of the opening paragraph refers to ebert and roeper's critique of the film. why is this not included under reactions? Citizenjamesford (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cameos

excluding paris hilton, none of these should qualify as cameos. cameos are short or unexpected performances by established performers or relevant people at the time of the production. if someone becomes famous years later you can't retroactively make that a cameo (richard dreyfus in THE GRADUATE, alfred molina in RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK, samuel l jackson in EXORCIST III). those are just starting actors in small parts before they were famous. if they were given bigger parts, they would have taken them. cameos are bruce willis in OCEANS TWELVE, sean connery in ROBIN HOOD PRINCE OF THIEVES or ted danson in SAVING PRIVATE RYAN.

i looked up all of these people on IMDB exlcuding hilton and the voice-over actor, none of these had done anything noteworthy at the time the film was made. Citizenjamesford (talk) 19:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messing with Character Names!

I know that in most of the Cat in the Hat books, the girl's name is Sally, and the boy's name is not revealed, but come on! Conrad? The writers of this movie must have not read Dr. Suess' book, "Oh Say, Can You Say Dinosaur?" That book clearly revealed that the boy's name was Dick. I guess I can understand if they thought the name, "Dick", was a little scatalogical, I can understand, but I really think they could have come up with a more suitable name than Conrad! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.218.135 (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Seuss-cat-hat.gif

The image Image:Seuss-cat-hat.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]