Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Crews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FlyingToaster (talk | contribs) at 09:15, 13 November 2008 (Adam Crews: where is my head?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Adam Crews (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

An apparent hoax. An alleged 28-year old philanthropist who founded a global NGO which saved 750,000 lives while continuing to study at college? No reliable sources (in fact, no sources at all) - extraordinary given the alleged global reach of the NGO and its claimed results. The alleged website for the NGO (ofo.org, listed in the external links) does not exist, and the references attached to the article make no mention of either the person or the organisation. If not a hoax, then an apparent failure of WP:N - no mentions in reliable secondary sources.Euryalus (talk) 08:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Sorry, I didn't see this AfD actually get filed, so I deleted the article blatant nonsense--I can undelete it if we want to run the formal AfD here. Actually, he would be 18 not 28, and I concur (as I responded to a fairly impolite msg on my talkpage from the creator) that all the sources were completely bogus. Part of a walled garden (tied subjects, worked by a closely-allied editor duo) with another article of similar extraordinary claims with cites that don't mention the subject at all (that was speedied by another admin, and has now been recreated). May as well bundle it in this AfD... DMacks (talk)
Joseph Shelton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Give me time and I promise I can get better sources. They do exist. I can prove these claims.STLisbetterthanChicago (talk) 09:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete them both. I'll rewrite when I have everything readily available.STLisbetterthanChicago (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Hoax. Non-notable. No sources are given. Dekisugi (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. Zero ghits for the Oranges For Orphans NGO. A couple of ghits for "Cutting Out Alzheimer's", but all of them refer to a one-time scrapbooking event, not an organization. The amount of documentation involved in setting up such an organization makes it highly implausible that both would pass completely unnoticed. Zetawoof(ζ) 09:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I tried to find any evidence of this not being a hoax and could not. The name of a charity at least should be findable, so unless a source turns up I'm assuming this is fictional. - FlyingToaster 09:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]