Jump to content

User talk:209.254.12.73

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zaros104 (talk | contribs) at 14:08, 14 November 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  • Note: this IP is registered to McLeodUSA, but it is not clear whether it is shared.

November 2008

Please don't undo my contributions to the Metal Gear Solid wiki page, as there is nothing wrong with it and it is under its own section, not randomly thrown into the page. If your going to change it again, atleast say what is wrong with it so I may tweek it to everyone's likings.

September 2007

Please don't remove maintenance templates such as the {{fact}} you removed from Video games notable for negative reception. They are there to highlight specific issues and should remain until these are addressed. Thank you, Miremare 17:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mortal Kombat, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 19:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Again, please do NOT remove maintenance templates from articles, like the {{Original research|date=October 2007}} that you removed from Mortal Kombat. They are there to highlight problems with the article and removing them without addressing the problems is unacceptable. Further instances of this may result in a block from editing. Miremare 20:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Mortal Kombat (film) appeared to constitute vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Beemer69 04:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Hardyplants 04:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not remove maintenance templates as you did to Sega Technical Institute with this edit. Seeing as you have already been given a last warning for vandalism by another editor above, any further instances of this will very likely result in a block. Miremare 16:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Blade Icewood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hammer1980·talk 10:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

--Nlu (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ian Cairns (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User_talk:209.254.12.73, you will be blocked from editing. Hiddenfromview 15:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mortal Kombat, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 19:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edits to Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were not constructive and have been reverted. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, or you may be blocked from editing. Beemer69 (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, you will be blocked from editing. Beemer69 (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2008

Stop repeatedly reverting Sheng Long and removing maintenace tags or a longer block will be imposed on you. JuJube (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you have been asked repeatedly not to remove maintenance tags from articles when the concerns they highlight have not been addressed. I'd like to ask you one more time to please respect the community's wishes in these regards. While your contribution history suggests that you have contributed quite a lot of good material to Wikipedia, edits such as those are considered disruptive. If you have a legitimate reason to protest the use of tags in those articles, you should discuss that on the talk pages of the articles involved and not simply remove them. Alternatively, I'm afraid that your account may be subject to lengthier blocks, something that I hope can be avoided. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Claire Danes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 20:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. JCTribe (talk) 16:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sonic & Knuckles has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Triona (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Cleveland–Loretta Quagmire constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 21:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry. · AndonicO Hail! 21:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edits you've made again to the Poison (Final Fight) page were reverted (again), as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Luke Cage (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it. All you guys who have left messages here for this user, hasn't he had enough warnings already? He's still removing tags asking for references. C'mon, get rid of him. 222.153.69.178 (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Tomb Raider, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [Jam][talk] 16:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kunta Kinte has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 20:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Pretty Ricky has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. –Cheers, LAX 22:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! - Master Bigode from SRK.o//(Talk) (Contribs) 19:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship sections in Family Guy articles.

They have no references at all, they need them since this is an encyclopedia. Stop removing those tags without fixing the problem please. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Meet the Quagmires has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Stereotypes of Hispanics constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 16:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Persistant vandalism

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mind Over Murder, you will be blocked from editing. Miremare 12:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE TO NEXT EDITOR: The above is a last warning, as are many others on this page, so please do not leave yet another lesser warning after his next offence, but report him for a ban at WP:AIV instead. Thanks. Miremare 12:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing, specifically removal of problem templates without addressing problems. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

He is back in removing fact tags without fixing the problem. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 14:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain, the fact tags are there because Wikipedia requires reliable source, so I'm asking you to stop removing fact tags and instead finding sources. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 14:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Spectacular Blue Smith worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vivio TestarossaTalk Who 10:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Ryu (Street Fighter), you will be blocked from editing. - Master Bigode from SRK.o//(Talk) (Contribs) 15:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Dragon Ball AF, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Lord Sesshomaru (talkedits) 18:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf42 09:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Resident Evil 5. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Please stop removing wikilinks without a reason!Insanity Incarnate 17:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chris Griffin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  16:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of fire drill regulations in the United States. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please do not continue to add this edit to the Chinpokomon article without providing a source to back up your claim of influence/reference. Information in wikipedia must be verifiable. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Do not continue to add this edit to the Street Fighter II: The Animated Movie article without providing a source to back up your claim of influence/reference. Information in wikipedia must be verifiable. --PlasmaTwa2 18:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Chinpokomon. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chinpokomon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Street Fighter II: The Animated Movie. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Street Fighter II: The Animated Movie. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Chinpokomon. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cammy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Jackol  ๏̯͡๏﴿ 22:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Detroit Pistons constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 16:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

STOP unlinking words from the I Dream of Jesus page CTJF83Talk 17:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Chinpokomon, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-- The Red Pen of Doom 15:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing those few words on the Crash Bandicoot articles? YOWUZA Talk 2 me! 17:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]