Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.14.18.119 (talk) at 19:07, 21 November 2008 (Articles created/expanded on November 17: fmt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kiki Wong
Kiki Wong

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Instructions

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose main body text has been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Suggested sounds should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using the format {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 26}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.

Symbols

  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined. You may use {{DYKproblem}} to notify the nominator
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix. You may use {{DYKproblem}} to notify the nominator
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Next update

The next update will be produced from queue 3.

There are five queues;

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on November 21

File:GandhiBoer.jpg
Your "oval" needs bolding. Can't see it! Might as well crop it. --74.14.18.119 (talk) 18:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Council House
Council House

Articles created/expanded on November 20

Will Venable
Will Venable
Knight Foundry
Knight Foundry
Length expansion, date verified. Offline hook reference accepted in good faith. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ack! My bad, it's not offline; I just forgot the URL. I have now added that to the link for full verification. howcheng {chat} 21:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty; good to go! --Rosiestep (talk) 04:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Although this is unflattering info about a living person, I think it's more than adequately cited and doesn't give it undue weight (it seems to be the source of his greatest notoriety), so meets DYK's standards for inclusion. Nevertheless, I can also put forward this alternative:
Robb Johnson playing live
Robb Johnson playing live
For those who don't speak French, the hook is cited in the La Dépêche du Midi reference: "le plus grand réseau de transport d'Europe", "the biggest transmission network in Europe". The 100,000km part is in references #1 and #5. — BillC talk 03:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 19

Suggest: "spoke" --> "delivered". --74.14.18.119 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Robert de LaSalle
Robert de LaSalle
Uskmouth Power Station
Uskmouth Power Station
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length, date and hook verified; however "has been described as one of the cleanest" may be more appropriate in the hook, since these statements are open to considerable debate, and the sources appear to be (loosely) linking back to the Uskmouth-B owners themselves. — BillC talk 18:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chester Beach
Chester Beach
Royal Cortissoz
Royal Cortissoz
Jelani Jenkins? Who? You're not going to connect with too many readers on the main page. --74.14.18.119 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
statue of George Mackay in Tamsui today
statue of George Mackay in Tamsui today

Articles created/expanded on November 18

The hook needs better support at this time. I'm going to work on it.Cbl62 (talk) 08:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rutherford B. Hayes
Rutherford B. Hayes
It would be good timing if this hook could be featured on Saturday -- the day of "The Game" between Michigan and Ohio State.Cbl62 (talk) 07:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks good, this is a significant event in Oregon history, worthy of DYK mention. I made a slight grammatical change. -Pete (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Constantine Moorsom
Constantine Moorsom
Re-name as "Winter of 1946-1947 in Britain"? --74.14.18.119 (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues At 216 characters, this hook is ineligible, but there's still time to suggest another. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted 16 characters. Otto4711 (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kuroda Sayako
Kuroda Sayako
  • The article says Israelis won't let Arabs live there permanently, and Israelis turned a Muslim shrine into a Jewish shrine. Please forgive my unfamiliarity with Mideast politics, but neither the hook nor the article answers this question: Do the Israelis forbid Muslims from making their pilgrimage anyway? Art LaPella (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Art LaPella. If I may, I think the festival just ended because in the wake of 1948 war, the 150,000 Arabs that remained within Israel and became citizens, needed travel permits to go from place to place. Israel was under Martial law#Israel. That would make getting 30,000 people together to go to a festival rather difficult since I doubt all 30,000 would be able to get a permit at the time. So though there may very well have been no official proclamation cancelling the festival, it would have been impossible to organize under the general circumstances. Note that martial law continued until 1967, and by that time, people would have gotten used to not having the festival and it would be difficult to reignite the tradition. Just my two cents. Tiamuttalk 17:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I sort of revised the "pilgrimage" part of the hook to reflect that in the article. In the Benvenisti source, it says it was not celebrated in the year of the war, but does not say if Muslims were forbidden to visit it. I'm sure they're allowed, but a festival of even close to such magnitude hasn't occurred since the village's capture. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the article mentions that most of the pilgrims came from the surrounding cities like Lydda, Ramleh and Jaffa. In those cities *at least* 90 % of the Arab population were expelled (outside Israels borders). So of the 30 000 people who attended pre-1948, only, say, a maximum of 2-3000 would have a theoretical possibility to attend post-48. And as Tiamut mentions above: they all needed travelling-permit. And from what I have read about those times: they were very difficult times for the non-Jews of Israel, I think celebrating at festivals was very low on their list of priorities. Regards, Huldra (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to use this picture at WCommons. Crop as you like. --PFHLai (talk) 23:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 17

How is this a new article ??. INS Tabar is a redirect to INS Tabar (F44) created on 16 April 2006 ! -- Tinu Cherian - 09:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose the nominator means recent expansion (though at a glance I'm not sure it's fivefold). —97198 (talk) 11:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at page history there was no 5 fold expansion on nov 21, I am afraid it is not a valid DYK nom :( -- Tinu Cherian - 12:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Expansion began on Nov 17 and was 5x (700 to 4100). Moving from Nov 21. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"important"? a little PEACOCK/POV-ish? --74.14.18.119 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Flora Perini
Flora Perini
  • ... that Navy discontinued its football series with Maryland for forty years after Terrapins' linebacker Jerry Fishman twice 'flipped the bird' to the Brigade of Midshipmen during the 1964 game? -- new article by User:Strikehold, self-nom Strikehold (talk) 16:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues No source to the fact that this rivalry is referred to as "The Crab Bowl." I'm not doubting that, but it is symptomatic of a deeper problem in the article: from my cursory glance, there's not even verification for the fact that this rivalry exists as a specific entity (as opposed to it just being a rivalry that you came up with in your head after looking at various sources on the teams' histories with one another and deciding that there was a rivalry there). Again, I'm not saying that it's wrong; rather, I'm saying that as the article currently stands, the very premise of the article is presented as being original research. Before anything else can even be worried about with this article, you need to supply some sources talking about the very concept of the Crab Bowl (rather than talking about specific incidents such as the middle fingering) to verify that the subject of this article is a real entity. —Politizer talk/contribs 02:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate and support the suggestion! I question the use of the term "abolitionist" as the sole qualifier; I recommend "journalist" or "editor" for Godwin. --Midnightdreary (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Irworobongdo
Irworobongdo
Suggest: "American made" --> "domestically produced". --74.14.18.119 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
José María Rojas Garrido
José María Rojas Garrido

Articles created/expanded on November 16

Cesira Ferrani
Cesira Ferrani
or ... that Les West's victorious cycle racing career spans 47 years from 1960 to 2006, and includes two victories in the Tour of Britain?
Valvata utahensis
Valvata utahensis
Kampana tower, Kotor
Kampana tower, Kotor
  • ... that the fortifications of Kotor represent one of the best examples of defensive Venetian military architecture? new, self-nom - Ekem (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • The hook is unclear. Does it mean these fortifications were some of the best-built out of all Venetian military architecture...or does it mean that these are some of the best-preserved examples of what Venetian military architecture used to be like? At first glance I thought the hook meant the first, but what seems to be in the article is the second. Please clarify the hook. —Politizer talk/contribs 23:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • The condition is not optimal as the article shows, there is damage from the earthquake and need for rehab, the documentation indicats it to be one of the "most important" examples, so it relates to the concept or planning and execution, and the hook should be:
... that the fortifications of Kotor represent one of the most important examples of defensive Venetian military architecture? Ekem (talk) 02:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's still quite unclear. What makes an architectural feature "important"? —Politizer talk/contribs 05:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks or doing an alternate. I just linked Trail Blazers just so you know. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 00:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks but I don't think it needs to be linked. Leaving it not linked emphasizes the fact that it's the same Trail Blazers as what was mentioned at the beginning of the hook; linking it presents it as "new" information (in the discursive sense), which it isn't exactly, since the Trail Blazers were mentioned at the beginning of the sentence. —Politizer talk/contribs 14:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ravnedalen
Ravnedalen
  • I unbolded Joseph Frantz Oscar Wergeland because it was created on the 11 and is too late for a DYK nom. Without having yet reviewed the content, the article on Ravnedalen is new enough to get a DYK.Nrswanson (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since the team was in New York when managed by McGraw, shouldn't this say "as the New York Giants' manager"?Cbl62 (talk) 00:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. I changed the hook accordingly. Rlendog (talk) 18:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created on Nov. 9, not Nov. 16. Cbl62 (talk) 00:41, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't notice that had been moved from a sandbox.Cbl62 (talk) 00:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine, it's verified. I duplicated the ref at the appropriate location. Just as a reminder for the future, the hook fact must have an inline citation right with it; having a ref at the end of the paragraph or even in a later sentence isn't really permissible, especially when the following sentence is "different" enough from the hook fact that it's hard to tell if it's from the same source. This is even more important in the case of offline or foreign-language sources, which most readers don't have access to. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues As the hook states Jacobsen did not have a career background in the military, that should be mentioned in the article as well. For now, the article simply doesn't mention military service. Another option would be an alt hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep typing, pal. I know you'll get to 1500+ very soon. :-) --PFHLai (talk) 19:03, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's about 3000 characters long now. And User: Spittlespat should be credited as a co-author. --PFHLai (talk) 22:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Thanks, PFHLai :) Chamal talk 00:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. :-) Thank you for writing up the requested article. --PFHLai (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issuesThe article looks good but there isn't enough information about the Australian Law Review source for me to feel comfortable verifying the hook or the article in general. Please provide some further information like who published it and when, and provide the names of any authors or editors that would relevent.Nrswanson (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have fixed the ref. Also added some online refs to verify hook. Assize (talk) 11:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on November 15

Retired military officer gets civilian government job afterwards? When else has that happened? Daniel Case (talk) 14:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3:... that before becoming a general in the American Civil War, James W. McMillan was engaged in businesses all over the U.S. state of Indiana? AdjustShift (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 has no inline citation in the article (plus there's Daniel Case's complaint...although I might still verify it if there were a citation, it depends on my mood); I still find ALT3 kind of vague. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The hook is not explicity stated in the article. It just says several blue chip recruits and not the exact number.Nrswanson (talk) 04:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now it says four.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Hook, references, and date are all good. However, a character count shows only 1,375 in prose so you're a bit short in length.Nrswanson (talk) 06:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to think I might be moving this hook closer to the main page, but anyway, I counted 1582 using the .css script or whatever it is. I still find the hook quite dull and the article too insubstantial, but I can't object to the article length per se. (although, of course, 1500 is just a lower limit, not a hard-and-fast rule...and the article is pretty bare and has almost no room for improvement as of now, given its speculative nature). —Politizer talk/contribs 06:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article is in no way speculative. There is no doubt that there will be a 2009-10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team. The facts are concrete and signing week just ended. This is a very timely article from the perspective of signing week just having occured. Furthermore, it is instructive to the casual sprots fan about the details of recruiting season. The article is bare bones, but it has instructive and encyclopedic value, IMO. How many basketball fans do you know? How many of them can explain the recruiting season to you? That is the value of this article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I read the count without spaces. It is over the limit with them. I agree that the article is timely and of value to the encyclopedia. However, I also agree with Politzer that the article is a bit sparce and the hook boring. I will once again state that this hook can be promoted to the main page if an editor chooses to do so, but I personally would not select this hook.Nrswanson (talk) 06:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And, so what? A coach wrote a book about a team he coached? What's unusual about that? Daniel Case (talk) 14:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- works for me. x5 expansion as old version was mostly quotes rather than text. However I have asked for an inline cite the first time this fact is mentioned to assist the checking process. thx Victuallers (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, this might be more accurate since Surtr only seems to lead anything in the Prose Edda and not the Poetic Edda:
See "Surt will ride in front, and both before and behind him there will be burning fire" in the paragraph covered by reference 11. :bloodofox: (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There needs to be an inline citation right with the fact; a whole paragraph doesn't automatically get "covered by" a single citation. See this sentence from the rules: "The hook fact must be cited in the article with an inline citation, since inline citations are used to support specific statements in an article. The hook fact must have an inline citation right after it since the fact is an extraordinary claim; citing the hook fact at the end of the paragraph is not acceptable." —Politizer talk/contribs 05:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on November 14

  • ... that the title of the album A.O. Mod. TV. Vers. is an abbreviation of Adults Only Television Version?
    • Alt Hook ... that the title of the album A.O. Mod. TV. Vers. is an abbreviation of Adults Only Television Version which used to appear in the bottom corner of late night movies in Australia? (little long winded, not sure how many characters this is, if someone can come up with a better one that's fine)
Nomination by RockManQ, created by Dan arndt, expansion by Shaidat cuebiyar. RockManQ (talk) 04:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Erg, it doesn't say anything about Mod. Would reference be better? RockManQ (talk) 20:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"reference to" would be fine if it's true, but I couldn't find anything about "Adults Only" in any of the references. Art LaPella (talk) 04:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let's just scrap this hook entirely and try to come up with an unrelated one. Given that no one has been able to figure out what Mod. stands for, we shouldn't have a hook about the meaning of their name—a hook shouldn't leave the reader feeling as if he's missing something. Please suggest a new hook quickly, because this nom is already past expiring. —Politizer talk/contribs 02:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mod stands for modified (not sure if that's the most reliable of sources though). As for other hooks, I don't have anything else. If you have one feel free to suggest it. RockManQ (talk) 02:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That source gives a different abbreviation than your original (that source gives Adult-Oriented instead of Adults Only). Given the apparent disagreement over this, I think it's too much of a pain to deal with for a hook; you can try skimming through the article and looking for something else interesting to suggest. —Politizer talk/contribs 02:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The existing NK1 receptor antagonist article is a stub. If someone want to merge them, it would be a >10-fold expansion. --PFHLai (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues This article will have to be renamed per MOS as the one below was before it can be reviewed. Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion about a move is already ongoing at WT:PHARM. --PFHLai (talk) 17:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed "antagonist" to "blocker", per the skomorokh's comments above. --PFHLai (talk) 18:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been moved and renamed per MOS by Politizer. The colon is gone. --PFHLai (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion about a move is already ongoing at WT:PHARM. --PFHLai (talk) 17:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The colon should be gone soon. If no one at WP:PHARM does, I'll move and rename the articles myself tomorrow. --PFHLai (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been moved and renamed per MOS by Politizer. The colon is gone. --PFHLai (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also