Talk:Trial of Charles I
Appearance
Law Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
I have noticed that a number of pages about the trial of Charles I link to a page about the current High Court of Justice which has no connection with the body that tried Charles I apart from the name. I have created this page to act as a destination for these links.
Rjm at sleepers 09:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
"House of Lords refused to pass the bill and consequently, it did not receive the Royal Assent". This should be probably say "and consequently, it was not presented for Royal Assent" or something of that kind. Surely it must be questionable whether it would have received Royal Assent even if the Lords had passed it? 86.134.10.71 (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Be bold - edit the article. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)