Talk:Eddie Johnson (English footballer)

Eddie Johnson (English footballer) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 5, 2008.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eddie Johnson (English footballer) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eddie Johnson (English footballer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Extremely well sourced, however the following concerns: The early life section is just one sentence, and would probably work to add some of the information from the Man U section to it. Either do that or remove it all together. Either way it's way to short. Also found way to much useage of he/him/his. Try to use Johnson's name more often, or remove some of the extra uses of the same pronouns. Other than that the article reads clear and makes sense to a non-follower of football. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the review.

I've moved a few of his more junior details (basically anything up to 15) to the "Early life" section. And I've tried to add a few more uses of Johnson. Hopefully it looks better now. Peanut4 (talk) 02:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still wouldn't mind a bit more information about him. The section just looks very empty and bare. Kaiser matias (talk) 04:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that is pretty much all there is from all the sources available on him. Peanut4 (talk) 11:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While it would benefit having more information on his early life, the wealth of information in the rest of the article, complete with heavy referencing, makes up or it. Kaiser matias (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, and thanks for the pass. I'll keep on trying to find more info to add to the early life section if any comes available. Peanut4 (talk) 23:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]