Jump to content

User:Ward3001/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ward3001 (talk | contribs) at 21:18, 6 December 2008 (user5). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

My Sandbox
Ward3001 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Ward3001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
span class: 1, 2, 3
Wikipedia:Other stuff exists
Observations on Wikipedia Behavior
[1]
WP:BADCHARTS
Ward3001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


A cumulatively dysfunctional system

Wikipedia's days are numbered, I fear, consumed by its own nonfeasance. Tribes of influential (= have the most free time on their hands) admins and editors have decided that WP policies say something other than what they actually say. They want to have loose reigns to make WP their playground for their own particular agendas. People who follow strict and standardized interpretations of policies threaten that and must be stalked and rebuffed.

The problem on WP is not so much the obvious trolls but the ones who make editing painful for other editors by repetitive questions, tendentious editing, private agendas hidden beneath yet lord of all arguments; immature teenagers and college students who view biographies of living persons as their private political platform rather than a task requiring the utmost responsibility and mature outlook, all in recognition that words can be like flames and real lives can and sometimes really are ruined or at least permanently altered; people who fill up talk pages with nonsense, who see the truth of contrary arguments yet refuse from selfishness to acknowledge them; who endlessly Wikilawyer the most obvious points, and enforce not the policies but the policies as they privately interpret them through the grid of their own private agendas.

Most people like me ended up at Missing Wikipedians much sooner, and many such people are enjoying the heck out of other, more responsible wikis, and some enjoying reading the jabs at places like Wikitruth. The price that has been paid and will continue to be paid until something changes is a Project in the guise of an encyclopedia that cannot even be cited by 1st graders, lest high schoolers. Welcome to your Wikipedia. I am done. CyberAnth 20:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


User:Raymond arritt/Expert withdrawal Proposal:

Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Wikipedia, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.

Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Wikipedia, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.

The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.

If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)


Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/WLU-Mystar

http://photobucket.com/mediadetail/?media=http%3A%2F%2Fi12.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa233%2Fits_a_monkeys_wedding%2Fextra%2FZooey%2520Deschanel%2Fsix.jpg&searchTerm=zooey%20deschanel&pageOffset=10