Talk:Computerworld

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computerworld article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Magazines Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

TfD nomination of Template:Computer Magazines

Template:Computer Magazines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --Fourohfour 13:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Notice included here to get attention of unbiased cross-section of potentially interested parties. TfDs and this template don't seem to get much attention on their own, but this template appears in lots of articles.) Fourohfour 13:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Secondary Sources

Despite the popularity of this magazine, I've not yet found a reliable secondary source that talks of the magazine itself. Editors should try hard to identify such to forestall potential nomination for deletion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Horizon Awards page

The article on the "Horizon Awards" was successfully nominated for procedural deletion between 15-20 November 2008. However the Awards appear at least marginally notable so I have merged the content into this page. I didn't include the extensive list of previous winners (which can be seen here) as they would overwhelm this short article and can just as easily be viewed at the Computerworld website.

On the surface this appears an uncontroversial merge, but if there are any disagreements please raise them here so a consensus can be reached either way. Euryalus (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]