User talk:66.82.9.75

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.

Warnings

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Christ page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Idioma 02:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to John Henry (folklore), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Idioma 02:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Kinetic theory, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Idioma 02:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Creation according to Genesis has blatant WP:NPOV problems, and appears to be trolling or vandalism. In light of your previous warnings, a short block seems to be in order, together with a welcome which I've added above in the hope that you'll learn from it. .. dave souza, talk 09:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. dave souza, talk 09:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

.

Warnings (after 1st block)

June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Sauce. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 00:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sauce, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron⁸³ 00:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

July 2007

Do not revert the edits made by the owner of his own talk page. That is nothing but petty vandalism. DreamGuy 06:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:DreamGuy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dust Filter 07:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:DreamGuy, you will be blocked from editing. --健次(derumi)^talk 00:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cameo (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 01:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Hasek is the best, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 17:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Northwest High School (Michigan), you will be blocked from editing. SJP 01:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 22:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Last warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

8 November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Jackollie 03:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to List of Mario series enemies, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 14:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Boomerang (UK & Ireland), you will be blocked from editing. -- azumanga (talk) 21:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kung Fu Panda. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 00:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shanti Wintergate has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/shanti) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 23:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. WadeSimMiser (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Block party has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 08:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The Howard Stern Show staff constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 08:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Your edits to 2008 in country music

Dear 66.82.9.75,
Some of your edits on the page 2008 in country music have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

No Wikipedia page has been linked to.

If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rise Guys has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Soliloquial (talk) 00:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pullman High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Pullman High School constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 02:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pullman High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 02:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George Berham Parr, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. srushe (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stopping the hate, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stopping the hate was changed by 66.82.9.75 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-11-30T18:10:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:10, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Stopping the hate constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 18:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stopping the hate, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Suggesting that users "have a problem with the LGBT community" just because they feel an LGBT article does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion are considered blatant personal attacks. Taking into account the numerous blocks and warnings given, this will be the only warning given. Any continued disruption will result in a prompt report to WP:AIV. MuZemike (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Stopping the hate. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar † 04:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

66.82.9.75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a dynamic HughesNet IP address.

Decline reason:

Not a valid unblock reason. This IP has a long history of vandalism. Create an account if you wish to avoid being autoblocked in the future. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

66.82.9.75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The fact that a dynamic IP address has a long history is irrelevant. At best this block, as well as any other blocks made to the same service provider, is ineffective. It does not stop the the guilty parties (that there is such a history suggests more than one vandal), and only makes inocent users suffer.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The fact that a dynamic IP address has a long history is irrelevant. At best this block, as well as any other blocks made to the same service provider, is ineffective. It does not stop the the guilty parties (that there is such a history suggests more than one vandal), and only makes inocent users suffer. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The fact that a dynamic IP address has a long history is irrelevant. At best this block, as well as any other blocks made to the same service provider, is ineffective. It does not stop the the guilty parties (that there is such a history suggests more than one vandal), and only makes inocent users suffer. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The fact that a dynamic IP address has a long history is irrelevant. At best this block, as well as any other blocks made to the same service provider, is ineffective. It does not stop the the guilty parties (that there is such a history suggests more than one vandal), and only makes inocent users suffer. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

---