Jump to content

User talk:79.131.245.60

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 79.131.31.114 (talk) at 15:55, 15 December 2008 (Warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2008 Greek riots. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Fut.Perf. 15:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And, by the way, would you mind getting yourself a named account? It's not obligatory, but it very much helps keeping track of who's been doing what on the article. If you wish to keep engaged with editing in contentious areas, a named account is highly recommended. Fut.Perf. 15:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ase mas re Future Pef. pou exoun apaftosei thn selida me ta POV statements tous...

Epishs se periptwsh pou den to prosekses den eimai o monos xwris account pou prosthetei sthn sygkekrimenh selida. den exww kanei kanena bandalismo kai auth thn stigmh etoimazw prosthikh gia to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Greek_riots#The_riots_and_political_crisis ok?

oops sorry if you want i can write what i said in german too...

No problem, Greek is okay. I know you are not the only anon right now, that's exactly why I'm asking you to identify yourself more clearly, by getting an account (especially since there may be several people on the same IP range, which makes things confusing.) - As for the edit warring, take for instance this small detail of characterising PASOK as a "center-left" party. That was actually me who put it in. I see no problem with NPOV here. That PASOK is in fact situated "center-left" (according to the Greek spectrum) is generally accepted, we say it ourselves in our main article. My thought was that it is needed as a service for outside readers, who are not familiar with what party is which. It's a minor thing really and I won't be making a big fuss over it. I'm just saying, you seem to be rather quick about reverting other people's changes, and according to our wiki rules, you need to be very careful not to repeatedly undo edits, unless there is a very strong reason for doing so (and even then, 3 times in 24h is a red line.) Fut.Perf. 15:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
so you would have no problem if i called the SPD a center-left party but Pasok is not exactly the same as the SPD in fact it is actually considered a right wing party by many greeks in any case if you wish you can revert my edit...