Talk:SHPS
SHPS received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Template:WikiProject Louisville
Companies B‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
I just started this page it is about a company in my home town ... i created this page not 5 minutes ago and it's already marked for speedy deletion ? M-BMor 07:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Ok done with the stub now. But more to come. Just need some time to put it together. Maybe copying and pasting the corporate mission statement was not such a great idea to begin with. This is not an ad. I don't know what else to say. M-BMor 08:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Added sufficient information about the company. Not sure what else to include this seems to cover major aspects of what they do and who they are. The references may need some clean up. M-BMor 03:28, 23 April 2007 (UT
Reassesment and Peer Review
Since posting the peer review tag I've gotten feed back that citations need to be intext. Done.
Also added a couple pictures one of my FSA Card with info edited out and the other of the building on Shelbyville Rd (from web cropped and downsized). No luck on a good shot of their HQ on Blugrass PRKWY. In short I think it's at least moved to a B.
Would the fact they have a national presence, employ over 1000 locally, and manage ALL the Federal Government Employees Flex-accounts deem this a MID Importance at least. I know they are not a high importance but maybe a mid vs low? Ok Thanks. M-BMor 02:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The article is still too much structured as a brochure, and I see quite a lot of formatting and grammar problems. Still a 'Start'. Low importance doesn't mean nonexistent importance. It's a mid-sized company in Louisville, but its topical relevance to Louisville is minor. I suppose if one was an employee of this company, they would see it differently. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Topical relevance makes since. Thanks. Fixed a couple spelling errors working on making it flow a bit smoother.M-BMor 20:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
There's still a lot of info in this article that makes it read like a corporate marketing brochure rather than an encyclopedia article. Further, I thought this company sprang at least partially from Prudential Service Bureau, but there's no mention of this. History cannot be hidden. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know about hiding history? But I'll look into that. M-BMor 19:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I found a rather detailed reference cleaned it up and added the info about the Prudential Bit. Thanks! M-BMor 13:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)