Talk:Electropunk

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music

New Wave music (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New Wave music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.New Wave musicWikipedia:WikiProject New Wave musicTemplate:WikiProject New Wave musicNew Wave music

Content

The contents of this page so far are approved by Scott Ryser, from The Units, one of the main synthpunk-classified bands in the article, with whom I'm in personal contact.

-It's not written like a Wikipedia article though. "Clash suck"? Thanks, internet encyclopedia!

(the above quote is probably in reference to the semi-vandalized (made hugely subjective) version of the entry from Oct 18th by "Lahmond") -djbrokenwindow

Nov 19, 2007 I overhauled the page and added copious references as the entry was set to be deleted (tomorrow!) for not having citations. If you look at the French Wikipedia page for synthpunk, you'll see an entirely different, and far more accepting acknowledgement of this genre name. It is ironic that their page doesn't mention the Metal Boys (and their later project Dr Mix And The Remix) who were straight up synthpunk.

A genre? How do I cite such a thing when it emerged as a retroactive identifier ONLINE first? You can find it used on countless music web sites (ebay used, but lots of new pages). It has a pretty specific range of characteristics across all the music described on the SYNTHPUNK Yahoogroups forum. If you search '"synthpunk genre"' in google, you get lots of hits. "Synth-punk" pulls up 18 in-print-on-paper articles in Washington Post and The Oregonian newspapers between 2004 and 2007(yesterday no less!)

It really annoys me that Wikipedia has such a blind disregard for decent online sources, but will accept printed-on-paper articles written by some inaccurate part time newspaper journo who may VERY LIKELY have been made aware of it ONLINE first. -djbrokenwindow 111907 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djbrokenwindow (talk • contribs) 04:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did some more fixes, typos, and added missing ref's, as well as tackled difficult issue of 'techno-punk' naming in 1978 vs this retro-active genre name, and why "Techno" doesn't mean now what it used to and thus gives purpose to a seperate signifier, aka "synth"punk

Put the 'techno-punk' ref source details in The Screamers article since i was dealing with it for this article.

Gave the techno article discussion some grief about not addressing the 'techno-' prefix vs the segue into a genre name, as related in my research here.

71.193.207.242 (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

undid a link to an advertisement for a band called the Magnificents, whose ad said it was quoting NME (and using the word synth-punk) If it is a source from "NME, Issue #, page #", not just a secondard quote of the review on an ad somewhere. that is like quoting an ad that says "this once source says" without any detail to back it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djbrokenwindow (talk • contribs) 02:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quasi Academic BS

So supposedly some guy in 1999 came up with this term? NONSENSE! Anyone else tired of these quick to write dweebs that write stuff like this? Go write for a fri*ging*** newspaper if you need to.***** This term was floating around even in the early 80's when when I was a teeny bopper. It was sort of associated with Electro which was more main mainstreamish and mixed with funk and was more danceable. If it needs to be termed and teamed with an originator then it's a tie between rock gods(now) Joy Division/Martin Hannett and Gary Numan/Tubway army