Talk:Compassion & Choices

Reductio ad Hitlerum = fail (Euthanasia was originally practiced by the Nazis...). I'm no supporter of euthanasia, but that sentence has absolutely nothing to do with the organization this page is about or any relevant current debate. Deleting. EDIT: Someone beat me to it.--Thud495 (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me this article thinks Compassion & Choices is doing a good job. Seems to me this article shouldn't offer its opinion. I'll edit it later if somebody doesn't beat me to it; I've just tagged it for now. Use of the word "effective" and the phrase "ensure a patient's right to a peaceful death" seem to be assuming things that can't be neutrally assumed. -Nietzscheanlie 02:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the the article is doing a good job to me too. 75.51.73.30 03:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that a further study of medicine and law (other than wikipedia) is necessary by those who write articles and comment on them.

Deleted two links to an organization not associated to Compassion & Choices --Compassionpdx (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Primary Sources tag; article is sufficiently sourced. --Compassionpdx (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I just saw the page for Hemlock Society DISAPPEAR! They refer you immediately to the Compassion and Choices page. Poof, Hemlock Society has disappeared from the pages of history! Don't you think that we should know about the Hemlock Society, at least as a historical footnote? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffgolin (talk • contribs) 05:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]