Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitzmas

Fitzmas

I say Keep as it is spreading and may stay connected for a long time. Look at google and watch as the hits grow.
I encourage Merge into Plame affair and redirect, per Talk:Fitzmas. --Raines 14:46 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Very obscure, topic not worthy of Wikipedia Paul Dehaye 23:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please indicate which of the deletion criteria you are using. Guettarda 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. - Paul Dehaye 23:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I concure, delete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.120.97 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 75,000ish Google hits. — ceejayoz ^{talk .com} File:Australia flag large.png 23:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, DailyKoscruft. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:39, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- With 74,500 google hits it has gone well beyond dKoscruft Guettarda 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Over 100,000 Google hits now. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 21:23, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but move to Plame Affair - Very obscure with no legs over time, but perhaps culturally relevant enough to incorporate into the Plame affair article. - Condorman 23:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This would violate the GFDL which requires that we keep all contributions. Guettarda 23:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks to Guettarda for feedback on viability of merging. Therefore, change vote to Delete. It's not viable as a standalone article. - Condorman 00:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Plame affair and redirect, as proposed on Talk:Fitzmas. --MarkSweep✍ 23:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - real, verifiable, over 74,500 google hits. Guettarda 23:46, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Plame Affair after drastically paring down the text. Thesquire 23:57, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At most, it is worthy of a mention in the Plame Affair one of the lamest scandals in political history. Capitalistroadster 00:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even worthy of an entry into Plame Affair. WCC2005 00:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes the Google test, relates to a prominent news story, and is more relevant than many number other internet memes with self-contained articles on Wikipedia. Fumoses
M>e<r>g<e into Plame Affair, per MarkSweep and Thesquire. Information is happiest when it is most completely in context, and this term has ballooned in use among liberals gleefully anticipating turmoil. BDAbramson ^talk 01:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
merge or keep Kappa 01:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - In a year's time, this cute little term will be forgotten by even the people who love it. This entry is nothing more than a vanity piece for Democrat Underground (and the one member in particular). Jinxmchue 02:23, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Plame Affair. If it still has legs in six months, break it out as its own page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.73.59.134 (talk • contribs) October 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Neologism. The word will have its 15 minutes of fame and by this time next year no one will remember it. ♠DanMS 04:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep or merge" Viajero | Talk 04:33, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect; this is worth maybe one sentence in the Plame Affair article. MCB 04:37, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as per MCB. Meelar (talk) 07:11, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect sounds good to me. TheMadBaron 07:55, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's claimed that 'Fitzmas' will be forgotten in a year, but this may not be the case. If people in the future refer back to the "Fitzmas indictments" to differentiate them from indictments handed down later in the investigation, the term may live on. Also, right-wing bloggers (NRO's Corner, for instance) have used the term several times themselves. So the meme appears to be a strong one. Neiladri 09:27, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- It's a great term that needs its place. Everybody's using it.... get on board! --Jryanlaw 15:37, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect It seems minor enough to not warrant its own article (yet) but used often enough that it's worthy of note in the main Plame affair article. --Yekrats 15:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - where is your Fitzmas spirit? Andyluciano 17:40, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This has been all over the U.S. liberal blogosphere for some time now. More notable than the average pokémon. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 21:23, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If the term is utterly forgotten next year, delete it then. Wachholder0 21:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It could be the day our country is saved from fascism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.81.116 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Plame Affair, name is otherwise a non-notable neoligism.--Sean Black ^{Talk^{22:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC)}}[reply]
Keep If we have articles for things like dog actors, we can certainly have articles for this. -- Dante 00:13, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]