Jump to content

Comet Hale–Bopp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Siim (talk | contribs) at 17:43, 23 January 2009 (et:). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)
Comet Hale-Bopp, shortly after passing perihelion in April 1997.
Discovery
Discovered byAlan Hale and
Thomas Bopp
Discovery dateJuly 23, 1995
Designations
The Great Comet of 1997,
C/1995 O1
Orbital characteristics
Epoch2450460.5
Aphelion370.8 AU[1]
Perihelion0.914 AU[1]
Semi-major axis186 AU
Eccentricity0.995086
Orbital period2533 a[1]
Inclination89.4°
Last perihelionApril 1, 1997[1]
Next perihelion~4530

Comet Hale-Bopp (formally designated C/1995 O1) was arguably the most widely observed comet of the twentieth century, and one of the brightest seen for many decades. It was visible to the naked eye for a record 18 months, twice as long as the previous record holder, the Great Comet of 1811.

Hale-Bopp was discovered on July 23, 1995 at a great distance from the Sun, raising expectations that the comet would brighten considerably by the time it passed close to Earth. Although predicting the brightness of comets with any degree of accuracy is very difficult, Hale-Bopp met or exceeded most predictions when it passed perihelion on April 1, 1997. The comet was dubbed the Great Comet of 1997.

The passage of Hale-Bopp was notable also for inciting a degree of comet-related panic not seen for decades. Rumours that an alien spacecraft was following the comet gained remarkable currency, and inspired a mass suicide among followers of the Heaven's Gate cult.

Discovery

The comet was discovered by two independent observers, Alan Hale and Thomas Bopp, both in the United States.[2] Hale had spent many hundreds of hours searching for comets without success, and was tracking known comets from his driveway in New Mexico when he chanced upon Hale-Bopp just after midnight. The comet had an apparent magnitude of 10.5 and lay near the globular cluster M70 in the constellation of Sagittarius.[3] Hale first established that there was no other deep-sky object near M70, and then consulted a directory of known comets, finding that none were known to be in this area of the sky. Once he had established that the object was moving relative to the background stars, he emailed the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, the clearing house for astronomical discoveries.[4]

Bopp did not own a telescope. He was out with friends near Stanfield, Arizona observing star clusters and galaxies when he chanced across the comet while at the eyepiece of his friend's telescope. He realized he might have spotted something new when, like Hale, he checked his star maps to determine if any other deep-sky objects were known to be near M70, and found that there were none. He telegraphed the Central Bureau of Astronomical Telegrams, and, the following morning, it was confirmed that this was a new comet, and it was named Comet Hale-Bopp, with the designation C/1995 O1. The discovery was announced in International Astronomical Union circular 6187.[3][5]

Early observation

Hale-Bopp's orbital position was calculated as 7.2 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, placing it between Jupiter and Saturn and by far the greatest distance from Earth at which a comet had been discovered.[6][7] Most comets at this distance are extremely faint, and show no discernible activity, but Hale-Bopp already had an observable coma.[3] An image taken at the Anglo-Australian Telescope in 1993 was found to show the then-undiscovered comet some 13 AU from the sun,[8] a distance at which most comets are essentially unobservable. (Halley's Comet was more than 100 times fainter at the same distance from the Sun.)[9] Analysis indicated later that its nucleus was 60±20 kilometres in diameter, approximately six times the size of Halley.[1][10]

Its great distance and surprising activity indicated that Comet Hale-Bopp might become very bright indeed when it reached perihelion in 1997. However, comet scientists were wary – comets can be extremely unpredictable, and many have large outbursts at great distance only to diminish in brightness later. Comet Kohoutek in 1973 had been touted as a 'comet of the century' and turned out to be very unspectacular.[4]

Perihelion

Hale-Bopp became visible to the naked eye in May 1996, and although its rate of brightening slowed considerably during the latter half of that year,[11] scientists were still cautiously optimistic that it would become very bright. It was too close to the Sun to be observable during December 1996, but when it reappeared in January 1997 it was already bright enough to be seen by anyone who looked for it, even from large cities with light-polluted skies.[12]

The comet became a spectacular sight in early 1997.

The internet was a growing phenomenon at the time, and numerous websites that tracked the comet's progress and provided daily images from around the world became extremely popular. The internet played a large role in encouraging the unprecedented public interest in comet Hale-Bopp.[13]

As the comet approached the Sun, it continued to brighten, shining at 2nd magnitude in February, and showing a growing pair of tails, the blue gas tail pointing straight away from the Sun and the yellowish dust tail curving away along its orbit. On March 9, a solar eclipse in China, Mongolia and eastern Siberia allowed observers there to see the comet in the daytime.[14] Hale-Bopp had its closest approach to Earth on March 22, 1997 at a distance of 1.315 AU.[15]

As it passed perihelion on April 1, 1997, the comet developed into a spectacular sight. It shone brighter than any star in the sky except Sirius, and its dust tail stretched 40–45 degrees across the sky.[16][17] The comet was visible well before the sky got fully dark each night, and while many great comets are very close to the Sun as they pass perihelion, Comet Hale-Bopp was visible all night to northern hemisphere observers.[18]

As impressive as the comet was, it could have been much more impressive. Had it passed as close to Earth as Comet Hyakutake (C/1996 B2) did in 1996 (0.1 AU),[19] the comet's tail would have spanned the entire sky and it would have been brighter than the full moon.[20]

After perihelion

After its perihelion passage, the comet moved into the southern celestial hemisphere, and its show was over as far as most of the northern hemisphere public were concerned. The comet was much less impressive to southern hemisphere observers than it had been in the northern hemisphere, but southerners were able to see the comet gradually fade from view during the second half of 1997. The last naked-eye observations were reported in December 1997, which meant that the comet had remained visible without aid for 569 days, or about 18 and a half months.[11] The previous record had been set by the Great Comet of 1811, which was visible to the naked eye for about 9 months.[11]

The comet continued to fade as it receded, but is still being tracked by astronomers. In October 2007, 11 years after the perihelion and at distance of 25.7 AU from Sun, the comet was still active as indicated by the detection of the CO-driven coma.[21] Astronomers expect that the comet will remain observable with large telescopes until perhaps 2020, by which time it will be nearing 30th magnitude.[22] By this time it will become very difficult to distinguish the comet from the large numbers of distant galaxies of similar brightness.

Orbital changes

Hale-Bopp at perihelion in April 1, 1997

The comet likely made its last perihelion 4,200 years ago.[23] Its orbit is almost perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic, which ensures that close approaches to planets are rare. However, in April 1996 the comet passed within 0.77 AU of Jupiter, close enough for its orbit to be affected by the planet's gravity.[23] The comet's orbit was shortened considerably to a period of roughly 2,533 years,[1] and it will next return to the inner solar system around the year 4530. Its greatest distance from the sun (aphelion) will be about 370 AU,[1] reduced from about 525 AU.[24][25]

Over many orbits, the cumulative effect of gravitational perturbations on comets with high orbital inclinations and small perihelion distances is generally to reduce the perihelion distance to very small values. Hale-Bopp has about a 15% chance of eventually becoming a sungrazing comet through this process.[26]

It has been calculated that the previous visit by Hale-Bopp occurred in July 2215 BC.[24] The comet may have presented a similar sight to people then, as the estimated closest approach to Earth was 1.4 AU, but no records of it have survived. Hale-Bopp may have had a near collision with Jupiter in early June 2215 BC, which probably caused a dramatic change in its orbit, and 2215 BC may have been its first passage through the inner solar system.[24]

Scientific results

Comet Hale-Bopp's neutral sodium tail (the straight tail extending up to the left from the nucleus)[27]

Comet Hale-Bopp was observed intensively by astronomers during its perihelion passage, and several important advances in cometary science resulted from these observations. The dust production rate of the comet was very high (up to 2.0×106 kg/s),[28] which may have made the inner coma optically thick.[29] Based on the properties of the dust grains—high temperature, high albedo and strong 10 μm silicate emission feature—the astronomers concluded the dust grains are smaller than observed in any other comet.[30]

One of the most remarkable discoveries was that the comet had a third type of tail. In addition to the well-known gas and dust tails, Hale-Bopp also exhibited a faint sodium tail, only visible with powerful instruments with dedicated filters. Sodium emission had been previously observed in other comets, but had not been shown to come from a tail. Hale-Bopp's sodium tail consisted of neutral atoms, and extended to some 50 million kilometres in length.[27]

The source of the sodium appeared to be the inner coma, although not necessarily the nucleus. There are several possible mechanisms for generating a source of sodium atoms, including collisions between dust grains surrounding the nucleus, and 'sputtering' of sodium from dust grains by ultraviolet light. It is not yet established which mechanism is primarily responsible for creating Hale-Bopp's sodium tail, and the narrow[27] and diffuse[31] components of the tail may have different origins.[32]

While the comet's dust tail roughly followed the path of the comet's orbit and the gas tail pointed almost directly away from the Sun, the sodium tail appeared to lie between the two. This implies that the sodium atoms are driven away from the comet's head by radiation pressure.[27]

Deuterium abundance

The abundance of deuterium in Comet Hale-Bopp in the form of heavy water was found to be about twice that of Earth's oceans. If Hale-Bopp's deuterium abundance is typical of all comets, this implies that although cometary impacts are thought to be the source of a significant amount of the water on Earth, they cannot be the only source.[33]

Deuterium was also detected in many other hydrogen compounds in the comet. The ratio of deuterium to normal hydrogen was found to vary from compound to compound, which astronomers believe suggests that cometary ices were formed in interstellar clouds, rather than in the solar nebula. Theoretical modelling of ice formation in interstellar clouds suggests that Comet Hale-Bopp formed at temperatures of around 25–45 kelvin.[33]

Organics

Spectroscopic observations of Hale-Bopp revealed the presence of many organic chemicals, several of which had never been detected in comets before. These complex molecules may exist within the cometary nucleus, or might be synthesised by reactions in the comet.[34]

Detection of argon

Hale-Bopp was the first comet where the noble gas argon was detected.[35] Noble gasses are chemically inert and highly volatile, and since different noble elements have different sublimation temperatures, they can be used for probing the temperature histories of the cometary ices. Krypton has a sublimation temperature of 16–20 K and was found to be depleted more than 25 times relative to the solar abundance,[36] while argon with its higher sublimation temperature was enriched relative to the solar abundance.[35] Together these observations indicate that the interior of Hale-Bopp has always been colder than 35–40 K, but has at some point been warmer than 20 K. Unless the solar nebula was much colder and richer in argon than generally believed, this suggests that the comet was formed beyond Neptune in the Kuiper belt region and then migrated outward to the Oort cloud.[35]

Rotation

Comet Hale-Bopp over Zabriskie Point, Death Valley, USA

Comet Hale-Bopp's activity and outgassing were not spread uniformly over its nucleus, but instead came from several specific jets. Observations of the material streaming away from these jets[37] allowed astronomers to measure the rotation period of the comet, which was found to be about 11 hours 46 minutes.[38] Superimposed on this rotation were several periodic variations over several days, implying that the comet was rotating about more than one axis.[39]

Satellite dispute

In 1999, a paper was published that hypothesised the existence of a binary nucleus to fully explain the observed pattern of Comet Hale-Bopp's dust emission. The paper was based on theoretical analysis, and did not claim an observational detection of the proposed satellite nucleus, but estimated that it would have a diameter of about 30 km, with the main nucleus being about 70 km across, and would orbit in about three days at a distance of about 180 km.[40]

The findings of this paper were disputed by observational astronomers, as even with the Hubble Space Telescope images of the comet revealed no trace of a double nucleus.[41][42] Also, while comets have been observed to break up before,[43] no case has previously been found of a stable binary nucleus. Given the very small mass of cometary nuclei, the orbit of a binary nucleus would be easily disrupted by the gravity of the Sun and planets.

Observations using adaptive optics in late 1997 and early 1998 were claimed to show a double peak in the brightness of the nucleus.[44] However, controversy still exists over whether such observations can only be explained by a binary nucleus.[10]

UFO claims

In November 1996, amateur astronomer Chuck Shramek of Houston, Texas took a CCD image of the comet, which showed a fuzzy, slightly elongated object nearby. When his computer sky-viewing program did not identify the star, Shramek called the Art Bell radio program to announce that he had discovered a "Saturn-like object" following Hale-Bopp. UFO enthusiasts, such as remote viewing proponent Courtney Brown, soon concluded that there was an alien spacecraft following the comet.[45] Several astronomers, including Alan Hale,[46] claimed the object was simply an 8.5-magnitude star, SAO141894, which did not appear on Shramek's computer program because the user preferences were set incorrectly.[47]

Later, Art Bell even claimed to have obtained an image of the object from an anonymous astrophysicist who was about to confirm its discovery. However, astronomers Olivier Hainaut and David J. Tholen of the University of Hawaii stated that the alleged photo was an altered copy of one of their own comet images.[48]

A few months later, in March 1997, the Heaven's Gate cult chose the appearance of the comet as a signal for their mass cult suicide. They claimed they were leaving their earthly bodies to travel to the spaceship following the comet.[49]

Legacy

Its lengthy period of visibility and extensive coverage in the media meant that Hale-Bopp was probably the most-observed comet in history, making a far greater impact on the general public than the return of Halley's Comet in 1986, and certainly seen by a greater number of people than witnessed any of Halley's previous appearances. For instance, 69% of Americans had seen Hale-Bopp by April 9, 1997.[50] It was a record-breaking comet—the furthest comet from the Sun discovered by amateurs,[15] with the largest well-measured cometary nucleus known after 95P/Chiron,[10] and it was visible to the naked eye for twice as long as the previous record-holder.[11] It was also brighter than magnitude 0 for eight weeks, longer than any other recorded comet.[15]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g "JPL Small-Body Database Browser: C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)". 2007-10-22 last obs. Retrieved 2008-12-05. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ Shanklin, Jonathan D. (2000). "The comets of 1995". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 110 (6): 311.
  3. ^ a b c Hale, A. (July 23, 1995). "IAU Circular No. 6187". IAU. Retrieved 2008-10-29. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ a b Lemonick, Michael D. (March 17, 1997). "Comet of the decade Part II". Time. Retrieved 2008-10-30.
  5. ^ Bopp, Thomas (1997). "Amateur Contributions in the study of Comet Hale-Bopp". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 79 (1–3): 307–308. doi:10.1023/A:1006262006364.
  6. ^ Marsden, B. G. (1995). "Comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)". Minor Planet Electronic Circular. 1995-P05.
  7. ^ Kidger, M. R. (1996). "Evolution of a Spiral Jet in the Inner Coma of Comet Hale-Bopp (1995 O1)". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 461: L119–L122. doi:10.1086/310008. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ McNaught, R. H. (August 2, 1995). "Circular No. 6198". IAU. Retrieved 2008-10-29. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ Biver, N. (1996). "Substantial outgassing of CO from Comet Hale-Bopp at large heliocentric distance". Nature. 380: 137–139. doi:10.1038/380137a0. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ a b c Fernández, Yanga R. (2002). "The Nucleus of Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1): Size and Activity". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 89 (1): 3–25. doi:10.1023/A:1021545031431.
  11. ^ a b c d Kidger, M.R. (2004). "The Visual Light Curve Of C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) From Discovery To Late 1997". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 78 (1–3): 169–177. doi:10.1023/A:1006228113533. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ Browne, Malcolm R. (March 9, 1997). "Comet Holds Clues to Birth of Time". The New York Times.
  13. ^ "The Trail of Hale-Bopp". Scientific American. 1997-03-17. Retrieved 2008-10-23.
  14. ^ McGee, H. W. (1997). "The total solar eclipse of 1997 March 9". Journal of the British Astronomical Association. 107 (3): 112–113. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  15. ^ a b c "Comet Hale-Bopp". Stardust. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA. November 26, 2003. Retrieved 2008-10-09.
  16. ^ West, Richard M. (April 13, 1997). "Comet Hale-Bopp (April 13, 1997)". European Southern Observatory. Retrieved 2008-11-23.
  17. ^ Shylaja, B. S. (1997). "What's New With Hale Bopp?". Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India. 25: 155–156.
  18. ^ West, Richard M. (March 7, 1997). "Comet Hale-Bopp (March 7, 1997)". European Southern Observatory. Retrieved 2008-11-25.
  19. ^ "Comet C/1996 B2 Hyakutake". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
  20. ^ Marcano, Tony (March 24, 1997). "A Shadow on the Moon Plus a New Star at Night". The New York Times. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
  21. ^ Szabó, Gy. M. (2008). "Cometary Activity at 25.7 AU: Hale-Bopp 11 Years after Perihelion". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 677: 121. doi:10.1086/588095. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ West, Richard M. (February 7, 1997). "Comet Hale-Bopp (February 7, 1997)". European Southern Observatory. Retrieved 2008-11-01.
  23. ^ a b Yeomans, Don (1997-04-10). "Comet Hale-Bopp Orbit and Ephemeris Information". JPL/NASA. Retrieved 2008-10-23.
  24. ^ a b c Marsden, B. G. (1997). "Orbit Determination and Evolution of Comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 79 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1023/A:1006268813208.
  25. ^ Williams, David R. (2005-12-23). "Comet Fact Sheet". NASA (National Space Science Data Center). Retrieved 2008-12-05. (pre-perturbation orbit: semi-major axis 250AU; period 4000yr)
  26. ^ Bailey, M. E. (1996). "Orbit Determination and Evolution of Comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 281 (1): 916–924. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  27. ^ a b c d Cremonese, G.; Boehnhardt, H.; Crovisier, J.;Rauer, H.; Fitzsimmons, A.; Fulle, M.; Licandro, J.; Pollacco, D.; Tozzi, G. P.; West, R. M. (1997). "Neutral Sodium from Comet Hale-Bopp: A Third Type of Tail". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 490: L199–L202. doi:10.1086/311040.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ Jewitt, David (1999). "Particulate Mass Loss from Comet Hale-Bopp". The Astronomical Journal. 117 (2): 1056–1062. doi:10.1086/300743. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  29. ^ Fernández, Yanga R. (1999). "The Inner Coma and Nucleus of Comet Hale-Bopp: Results from a Stellar Occultation". Icarus. 140: 205–220. doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6127. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  30. ^ Mason, C. G. (2001). "Observations of Unusually Small Dust Grains in the Coma of Comet Hale-Bopp C/1995 O1". The Astrophysical Journal. 549 (1): 635–646. doi:10.1086/319039. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ Wilson, J. K. "Three tails of comet Hale-Bopp". Geophysical Research Letters. 25 (3): 225–228. doi:10.1029/97GL03704. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  32. ^ Cremonese, G. (1997). "Sodium In Comets". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 79 (1): 209–220. doi:10.1023/A:1006245619568. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ a b Meier, Roland (1999). "Cometary Deuterium". Space Science Reviews. 90 (1–2): 33–43. doi:10.1023/A:1005269208310. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  34. ^ Rodgers, S. D. (2002). "Organic synthesis in the coma of Comet Hale–Bopp?". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 320 (4): L61–L64. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04208.x. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  35. ^ a b c Stern, S. A. (2000). "The Discovery of Argon in Comet C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)". The Astrophysical Journal. 544 (2): L169–L172. doi:10.1086/317312. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  36. ^ Krasnopolsky, Vladimir A. (1997). "Detection of Soft X-rays and a Sensitive Search for Noble Gases in Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1)". Science. 277: 1488–1491. doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1488. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  37. ^ "Bergeron Comet Hale-Bopp Animation". Stardust. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA. Retrieved 2008-10-14.
  38. ^ Warell, J.; Lagerkvist, C.-I.; Lagerros, J. S. V. (1999). "Dust continuum imaging of C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp): Rotation period and dust outflow velocity". Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. 136: 245–256. doi:10.1051/aas:1999213.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. ^ Licandro, Javier (1998). "The Rotation Period of C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp)". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 501: L221–L225. doi:10.1086/311465. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  40. ^ Sekanina, Z. (1997). "Detection of a Satellite Orbiting The Nucleus of Comet Hale–Bopp (C/1995 O1)". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 77 (3): 155–163. doi:10.1023/A:1006230712665.
  41. ^ McCarthy, D. W. (2007). "Comet Hale–Bopp in outburst: Imaging the dynamics of icy particles with HST/NICMOS". Icarus. 189 (1): 184–195. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.01.019. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  42. ^ Weaver, H. A. (1999). "Post-Perihelion HST Observations of Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1)". Icarus. 141 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6159. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  43. ^ Sekanina, Z. (1997). "The problem of split comets revisited". Astronomy and Astrophysics Letters. 318: L5–L8.
  44. ^ Marchis, F. (1999). "Adaptive optics observations of the innermost coma of C/1995 O1. Are there a "Hale" and a "Bopp" in comet Hale-Bopp?" (PDF). Astronomy & Astrophysics. 349: 985–995. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  45. ^ Jaroff, Leon (April 14, 1997). "The man who spread the myth". Time. Retrieved 2008-10-30. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  46. ^ Hale, Alan (1997). "Hale-Bopp Comet Madness". Skeptical Inquirer. 21 (2): 25–28.
  47. ^ Burnham, Robert (2000). Great Comets. Cambridge University Press. p. 191. ISBN 9780521646000. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  48. ^ Tholen, David J. (January 15, 1997). "Fraudulent use of a IfA/UH picture". European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere. Retrieved 2008-10-14.
  49. ^ Robinson, Wendy Gale. "Heaven's Gate: The End". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 3 (3). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00077.x. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |doi_brokendate= ignored (|doi-broken-date= suggested) (help)
  50. ^ Aguirre, Edwin L. (1997). "The Great Comet of 1997". Sky and Telescope. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

References

  • Newcott, William R. (Dec. 1997). "The age of comets". National Geographic, p. 100.

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Comet_Hale–Bopp&oldid=265947622"