Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weather weenie

Delete. At best, nn forumcruft, at worst, complete nonsense. MCB 01:25, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Flapdragon 01:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. utcursch | talk 04:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 06:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN - is much funnier than some entries moved there - KillerChihuahua 11:46, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. PJM 12:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neogolism concerning non-notable subject, with a good deal of nonsense to boot. TheMadBaron 16:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Fix Obviously needs cleanup, but notable, though small based subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.101.9 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A Google search returns 764 hits. This is a somewhat popular neologism that is accepted among more than just a few forums. However, the article seems to pertain to a specific internet forum, so its content should be overwritten. The emergence of this term is probably related to the increased interest in weather among the general American population due to the severity of the 2004 and 2005 Atlantic hurricane seasons. --TantalumTelluride 21:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs major cleanup but why not keep it? It is a topic of conversation and part of the new 21st Century vernacular among those in the Scientific Community.