User talk:Aidarhaynes5

Little context in Falcon-Knight

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Falcon-Knight, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Falcon-Knight is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Falcon-Knight, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your request for adminship

Users should only request rights at Meta when there are no local bureaucrats to do the job, and only then if the local community supports the request. Currently, the English Wikipedia has a plethora of bureaucrats to do promotions locally (check here) and therefore it has no need for Meta to handle its promotions.

If you'd like to become an administrator, your best bet would be to wait until another administrator nominates you: It's far more likely that the vote would succeed in this case. If you choose to go ahead and run for the position, however, you'll want to request it at WP:RFA here. Good luck to you either way. Kylu (talk) 02:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference: SR/P request at Meta

Falcon-Knight?

In December 11, 1926, the new Falcon-Knight was made.

That's the whole opening section.

For various reasons I won't go into, I suspect that the Falcon-Knight was a car. (Or maybe an airplane or a boat?) But I don't know. I should know, because the first sentence should tell me. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 8001000A

I have nominated 8001000A, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8001000A. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Waterjuice (talk) 06:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expand tags

Please dont tag stubs with {{expand}}: the expansion request is already there: in the {{stub}} template. And a small article with multi tags looks very ugly. - 7-bubёn >t 07:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using twinkle right now

Per [1] where you've reverted an adminstrator and long time contributer in the process of removing unsourced information while also saying why on the talk page, please remove Twinkle from your monoscript. - brenneman 07:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bah, did I just pull the "I'm an admin" card? Shame on me. Regardless, you're apparently not familiar enough with normal editing to do high-speed editing. Upon reviewing your contributions, the notes you've been left in the past regarding editing tools, and the unacceptably high level of mistakes you're making using them, I'm going to upgrade that to "Please remove all gadgets from your monobook at once." Thank you. - brenneman 07:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're not responding to comments, and continuing with high-speed edits

You're still using TW/Friendly in a manner that posts previous to mine indicated inappropiate. If you do not stop and talk right now I'm going to have to block you. Are you seeing the orange bar? - brenneman 07:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No i'm not, i've stop using that, 30 min. ago, and when can i use it?(aidar24 (talk) 07:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]