User talk:Darth Panda

SEMI-RETIRED

I am retiring my public face. I will continue to edit with NocturneNoir (talk · contribs).

This is Darth Panda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 7 days

Esenthel Engine

I don't quite agree with your rationale that "it's not spam" and "can be improved" (with what?). I am going to AFD on this. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esenthel Engine. No hard feelings; I just disagree. Thank you, MuZemike 06:16, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no problem. I was considering prodding, but my rational for declining the speedy can be found on the AfD. Thanks for taking the time to notify me! DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 12:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was too, but it was already prodded. Cheers, MuZemike 17:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Reversion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esenthel Engine

Hi, I was using the Anti-Vandal tool for spelling and I accidentally clicked revert. Sorry for any inconvienience. manadude2 (talk) 12:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Darth Panda. You have new messages at Manadude2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:FLC

Sorry, I usually don't copy-edit series I'm not familiar with, especially plot summaries in which I usually take great care to ensure that there's no undue weight. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 11:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith

Hello. Please forgive the spam but since Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith is heading toward a very close decision, I'm contacting all editors who were in the "Neutral" section in the hope that they can take a second look at the RfA and make a more explicit recommendation (either way). Thank you, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thankspam

Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.

Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board.

Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better.

Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denbot (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nestor Aparicio

I've asked for semi-protection - then I think we'll have to go some way back to get an unvandalised version. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your hard work reverting vandalism, (in which you beat me to it most of the time.) :) lol. Keep it up! astatine-210 ^{discovered elements, what am I?} 15:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]