Jump to content

Talk:County Route 97 (Rockland County, New York)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GroundhogTheater (talk | contribs) at 20:54, 31 January 2009 (Merger Proposal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconU.S. Roads: New York Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations
 New York  
Note icon
This article does not have a map. Please work with the Maps department to create and add a file for this article.
Note icon
This article may or may not contain a junction list. Please check, then add |needs-jctint= to this template accordingly.
 

Merger Proposal

I believe this article should be merged, adding elements of the "History" section into the target article. Andy 1One (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is far too much topic-specific content to merge into the "list" article. --Oakshade (talk) 04:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Far too much? The route description is basically the same as the lead, and the history can easily be merged. Look at the other routes on the main list? There are entries longer than Route 97! The AfD said keep, so I say MERGE NOW! (making a point, not yelling:) )--GroundhogTheater (talk) 07:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merger. --Rschen7754 (T C) 09:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As do I. Groundhog, you even said yourself in the AfD that this article has been around for quite a while, so why must it be merged or deleted now? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge- The information has been either on the page or the list for months. So I was saying Andy's AfD was not premature. Don't twist my words, I don't twist yours. Not asking you to agree with me, but respect my stance. Thanks! --GroundhogTheater (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]