User talk:24.160.145.53

Re:

Firstly, yes, I suppose you're right. I was over-generalising, so I shall rephrase. In general, spoiler sites are not reliable source. Second, whether or not your uncle run a wrestling website is completely irrelevant. ewrestlingnews.com is not considered a reliable source, and that is highly unlikely to change. Third, read WP:No personal attacks, and don't attack me by insulting my intelligence. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

If you felt I was insulting you I apologise. That was not my intention. No, I do not get to determine what sources are deemed reliable. The sources are judged by WP:RS, and most spoiler sites fail, because they do not have proven, obvious and verifiable fact checking. Reliable ones relating to wrestling include The Wrestling Observer, and SLAM! Sports. WWE.com is considered reliable for match results, releases, suspensions, and so on, but it wouldn't be considered reliable for stuff like "Jeff hardy was found unconscious in a stairwell" type-of thing. Also, if you could please not overwrite you previous comments on my talk page, I'd really appreciate it. I like being able to see the full context of the conversation I am currently involved in. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 06:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, whether or not you consider it to be reliable unfortunately doesn't matter with regards to Wikipedia policy. *Shrugs* Nothing I can do about it. :) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 06:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:RS. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 07:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Read this, it states reliables and non reliables [1] CFountain (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

User

Hey why don't you create a user account?, it's much easier to recognize you. CFountain (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

---