User talk:Theology10101

Please Discuss Here and Sign Your Statements

Given your persistent refusal to discuss changes first I have asked for intervention here. I note that you have seen fit to delete previous requests and warnings from your talk page. --Snowded TALK 05:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who started the messages on the talk board and been trying to be productive. I have no doubts that if an administrator looks at what is said and done, that you'll be charged with harassing me by reverting every edit (by not being productive) that I've done and essentially holding me prisoner by stalking my edits and reverting each one of them. I've sourced my contributions, all I ask is to let the objective truth be told, even if you object to Christianity or any other philosophy Theology10101 (talk) 07:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It appears many other users have been having many problems with Snowded (talk) and has been harassing others as well, please see his talk page Snowded (talk) for further complaints on him Theology10101 (talk) 07:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent actions

Its normal if you raise something with admins to notify any involved editor. You might want to note that for the future (although I see it was archived within action). Now I assume you willselectively edit your user page again to try and cast yourself in a better light. However the history is always there for people to see. --Snowded TALK 20:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well at least you admit that you stalk and follow me around everywhere I go. Theology10101 (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see him admitting anything of the sort. I have your talkpage watchlisted, yes, but that is only so that I pick up on silly, unfounded comments like that. Ironholds (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And this response, rather than an apology is all we can expect --Snowded TALK 05:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry you are stalking me? Theology10101 (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naturalism (philosophy). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concerns Toddst1, I too am concerned because the user Snowded is "not engaging in consensus building" and is reverting every edit I've ever done in what seems to be an attack on me, frankly I don't know what to do in that situation, if you can help me in any way I would be very grateful Theology10101 (talk) 07:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]