Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome/doc

Usage of this template

This template is to be used on Talk pages. The most simple use of this template:

{{Classical Greece and Rome}}

produces

and adds the Talk page to the categories Category:Unassessed Classical Greece and Rome articles and Category:Unknown-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles.

The template can be made more effective in organizing pages by rating the article with Version 1.0 Editorial Team's Assessment Table (see below).

To do this, add "|class={add class name}" to the template like so:

{{Classical Greece and Rome|class=FA}}

which produces

and adds the Talk page to the categories [[:Category {insert class name} class Classical Greece and Rome articles]] and Category:Unknown-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles.

Importance can also be judged using the template through the importance scale, adding further depth to the classification. This is done by adding "|importance={insert importance level}" to the template like so:

{{Classical Greece and Rome|importance={add importance level}}

which produces

and adds the Talk page the categories Category:Unassessed Classical Greece and Rome articles and [[:Category:{add importance level}-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles]].

Classical Greece and Rome articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA	7	9	32	44			92
FL	1		1	2			4
A		2	8	11			21
GA	19	33	109	176		4	341
B	66	101	434	535	1	144	1,281
C	71	177	743	1,680		230	2,901
Start	13	98	1,521	7,157		351	9,140
Stub		1	330	7,981	1	365	8,678
List	2	23	119	1,243	25	120	1,532
Category					313		313
Disambig					83		83
File					61		61
Portal					4		4
Project					3		3
Template					116		116
NA		8	66	492	241		807
Other					1		1
Assessed	179	452	3,363	19,321	849	1,214	25,378
Unassessed			2	48	1	231	282
Total	179	452	3,365	19,369	850	1,445	25,660
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 113,928			Ω = 5.07

The Version 1.0 Editorial Team assessments for Classical Greece and Rome articles:

Using both together along with tools such as catscan and perhaps in the future bots, articles identified to be in need can be better attended to through organized collaberation. -PoptartKing 18:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)