User talk:Darth Panda

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of February 2009.

See User:Darth Panda

This is Darth Panda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 7 days

Jeffrey Blankfort

Thx. Is it ok now ? Al Maghi (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I still question the notability of the subject, but I don't suppose it can be speedied under A7 now. Tag removed. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 21:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SOSLynx and Speedy Deletion

Hey, see the talk page of the article. Thx... Phoenix of9 (talk) 21:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, re: Vandalism reverts

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You're too fast for me! On behalf of all Wikipedia users, thank you for your contributions to help prevent vandalism! Ericdn (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 22:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I always give credit where credit is due. Thank you, too, for your help! --Ericdn (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Music festivals in yorkshire

Sorry about the Music in yorkshire mess - please put me out of my misery and delete the offending item. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I am not an admin, I cannot delete the page. However, I have tagged the page and fully expect that it should be deleted shortly. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CSD Tagging

With all due respect, if you found that page comprehensible, you may be familiar with some language I evidently am not.

In part I kid. I confess I mostly skimmed it. You're a better editor than I for actually taking the time to read it in depth and address it more accurately. But in the glance I gave it, it seemed quite incomprehensible to me. If it was not, my thanks to you for setting it straight. - Vianello (talk) 01:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I'm hardly a better editor. WP:PN is very specific and a personal pet peeve of mine (and of many other users). Technically, it should be a page that is thoroughly incomprehensible: no words of a known language (i.e. a;lsdkgj632q or random strings of characters). The page you had tagged was in English, though it was a load of nonsense. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sorry. Should i just tag it as vandalism then? or A7? Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 01:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it with an A7. You'd probably have to take it on a case by case basis... Personally, I'd prefer to be as lenient in CSDing to allow them possibility to expand. In the cases above, the deletion was pretty blatant though. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for the help/support. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 01:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I found this page: List of Famous Niggahs, and I tagged it G10, since it seems like an attack, because N***** is a derogatory term. Any ideas? Not sure if G10 is appropriate. Thanks. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 22:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Deleted already. Peace. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 22:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your tag was correct, by the way. Both the content and the title can qualify an article as an Attack Page, in my opinion. If the content was good though, a move might have been in order, but seeing as it was deleted, I doubt this is the case. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 04:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bottage

Your Bottage is Deconstructive to the human condition; if humanity wants chaos why are you letting a robot computer program correct that? 70.88.99.170 (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not using a robot computer program. I am using an editing tool that enhances my ability to undo vandalism, but the vandalism is undone by my hand and not by a bot. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Fair Compromise. Does wikipedia allow Editing tools that promote vandalism? Just Curious, if the playing field is level

(BTW), I'm sorry to have troubled you with all of this, but I was having so much fun. =) 70.88.99.170 (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly. It would be quite problematic, wouldn't it? DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 01:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But if the playing field is level and Chaos wins, doesn't that mean that Chaos SHOULD win? Why should 'Good' tools that help people be allowed if 'bad' tools that allow people are not allowed? OR, to better phrase it, if I wrote a 'bad' tool, would it be allowed? or would it not be allowed to exist? Should I make my own Chaotipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.99.170 (talk) 02:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, we just block anybody who supports chaos. It's like the real world: the law is usually more influential and therefore defeats "evil" so to speak. I haven't seen anarchy in an established country for ages. DARTH PANDA^{duel • work} 03:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I wasn't trying to disregard your advice, I just thought I would take a chance at it. I thank you for your advice and thought it well-through. astatine-210 ^{discovered elements ∞ what am I?} 22:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come back

Come back, we all want you here! Just because you don't like reverting vandalism doesn't mean you have to. Come back and do what you were going to do with NocturneNoir (talk · contribs). This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions astatine-210 ^{discovered elements ∞ what am I?} 22:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]