Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazinto

~~Neologism that is not in wide use and even if it was,~~ Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Mgm|^(talk) 11:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, I can't find much usage of this term anywhere (look at this, for example) to make it notable enough for a transwiki to Wiktionary. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 12:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: My bad. I deleted both of the user's terms when I saw the date he'd cited at the bottom of each. I restored them after he'd convinced me they were terms in general use. I couldn't find any relevant Googles, but then again I'm not a programmer. I feel I should vote neutral leaning toward delete. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Not a neologism, but tech jargon. This has been around a long time, in reference to hardware as well as software. As one who works in the aerospace industry, I have used "gazintas" and "gazouttas" for many years. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 17:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. It should still go on dicdef grounds, though. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Every run-together contraction doesn't need its own dictdef. Jclemens (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WP:NOTDICDEF, anyone? --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 03:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]