User talk:Tanthalas39
Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why.
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
It's the weekend, and you know what that means...
User:Kneehideep I'm pretty sure it's our old buddy, hasn't completely given themselves away just yet. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like it was already taken care of. Tan | 39 19:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yea, that was fast, seems there's a lot of eyes "on the case" lately. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I know this is going back a bit, but when I asked for this sub-template to be protected I meant semi-protection as per Template:Infobox Korean name; could you please lower the protection level accordingly? Cheers! PC78 (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Tan | 39 13:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Re: previously kept article relating to AfD
[Please ignore welcome message as it does not apply to experienced eds. and admins.; but gist follows. As your previous AfD is archived, I'm posting here (at sugg. of keeping admin.]
Copyright problem: Champika Liyanaarachchi
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Champika Liyanaarachchi, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.cjaweb.com/index.pl/article?id=91222, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Champika Liyanaarachchi and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Champika Liyanaarachchi with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Champika Liyanaarachchi.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Champika Liyanaarachchi saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! NYScholar (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
[I won't be dealing further w/ this article, but just wanted to alert you; you may want to alert the other admins. involved in the AfD closing. --NYScholar (talk) 06:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)]
About your protection of LoveGame
Hi! I see you protected LoveGame as a redirect because of lack of notability. Somebody has made an end run around that protection and created LoveGame (Lady GaGa Song). Would you mind taking a look at that and seeing if your prior objections apply to the new article? If not, I'd like to move it to LoveGame and unprotect that title, but I don't want to override your protection without checking with you. Thank you! —C.Fred (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Are you still awaiting an answer here, C.Fred? Tan | 39 16:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Pro Bowl
Is this right and current? I was going to cross check my photos from the game to see if I had any of your boys but no Lions made the Pro Bowl? I was on the NFC side so don't have many AFC pics other than practice shots, but let me know if there are other pics you'd like. StarM 04:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Requesting protection for a file
Hello,
This file seems to get a lot of vandalism given its title and the article it is on. I was wondering if it is sensible to semi protect it. I am aware there needs to be a sustained high level of vandalism for it to be protected but I think it's an easy target. Thanks --DFS454 (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Next time, please take requests to WP:RFPP. Tan | 39 16:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)