Jump to content

User talk:TJ Spyke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Big Luth (talk | contribs) at 17:48, 26 February 2009 (→Yeah...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 22. Archives prior to February 10, 2008 (Archive 16) were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Hey

it was not speculation, it was on the WWE website at the time I posted it, they must have removed it this morning--Jdrouskirsh (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey TJ Spyke do you have a Yahoo? Save Us.Y2J 3:48 24 January 2009

No, I mean Instant Messenger? Save Us.Y2J 3:52 24 January 2009

Oh, its ok, would you be able to help me with an article? Save Us.Y2J 3:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

K, thanks Save Us.Y2J 4:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey Save Us.Y2J 8:29, 1 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Alright thanks for the comment, man Save Us.Y2J 12:29, 7 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, well I don't live in America, I live in Australia, (if you didn't know), so I don't know what time it is over there, but um....I'll talk to ya some other time my friend. Save Us.Y2J 4:47, 19 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Hey, sign into Windows Live or when you can. Save Us.Y2J 2:55, 21 Feburary 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello, HBK fan
Thanks for being one of the major contributors at ≈ Shawn Michaels ---Go HBK!!!---

German Wikipedia

Please note. Thank you. --Hardcore-Mike (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:210.49.251.226

Just wanted to point out that this user is the indefinately blocked User:AKR619. He doesn't interfer with the the pages i recognise him from, due to having the page semi-protected to stop him, but he has commented on the talk page there (at List of science fiction themes), so i'm certain. So if he gets too annoying with the vandalism and adding unsourced opinion, the blocking admin or sockpuppet report or WP:ANI might be interested. I'm staying away, but keep up the good work!Yobmod (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni

Do you like the new table? I personally prefer the old one, and want your opinion! Like, come on, in the old one, you could easily find out the date of departure of wrestlers, now you can't. Altenhofen (talk)

Well Yeah, that is an issue, but is there even an "employees who died while under contract" section? I don't believe there is. I also have another question, it doesen't involve wrestling though, and I will ask it at the bottom of the page. Altenhofen (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gail Kim

Go to WWE.com. Go to their menu section (Photos, Exclusives, Videos, etc.) Click on the Videos tab. It states "Gail Kim is coming to SmackDown" thus her return. --TRUCO 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but did you check the wording that they have under that video which states Gail Kim is coming to SmackDown [which implies that she is returning to the company]. The problem is that you are placing it as "training" video [that is wording that is not necessary, just a straightforward statement is needed, like that it confirms her return via a promo.--TRUCO 22:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's what I meant. I should have been more elaborate. But in a way the video also implies that, why would they have a video of her training for like no reason? --TRUCO 22:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, best.--TRUCO 23:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

Since early summer, last year, I have wanted a custom Signature. I asked someone to make me one, and they did; but it doesen't work.

This is it: Altenhofen

This is another posibility: Altenhofen

When I put it in and check the raw signature thing (so it doesen't just turn into a link), it says "Invalid Signature, Check HTML tags".

Could I please get some help? Thanks if the answer is yes. Altenhofen (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked up HTML Tag on teh site, and I think i know what to do. Altenhofen (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CM PUnk

I didn't do anything to CM Punk's profile — Preceding unsigned comment added by KafeEman (talk • contribs)

I meant Ron Killings. TJ Spyke 00:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WWE has them in this order

WWE has them in the following order - WWE, World, ECW, IC, US, World Tag, WWE Tag, Divas/Women's. [1] This revised order is to reflect brand order. --UnquestionableTruth-- 01:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, WWE has always gone by the order of Raw/ECW/SmackDown. They do this to reflect the weekly schedule order of the brands. In fact, for try-branded PPVs near the end of the brand exclusive PPV era in 2007, WWE ordered the brands as such during the PPVs [2] [3] --UnquestionableTruth-- 01:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually TJ, following One Night Stand 2007, all PPV intros no longer mention brands. So your statement is false. Here's your GAB 2008 reference [4] --UnquestionableTruth-- 02:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again TJ, not to make an issue of this, but - baseless argument. I am open for further discussion. --UnquestionableTruth-- 04:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The final two PPVs to feature the Raw, ECW, SD intro in that order were JD and ONS. Following that the PPVs were no longer mentioned. I am aware of how they are listed on WWE.com. However, the Raw, ECW, and SD order is done to reflect the scheduled order of the brand (same reason as to why the order was changed as such for the PPV intros near the end of the brand exclusive PPV era). Now if you would like to go by the order WWE lists its titles on WWE.com then the order would be WWE, World, ECW, IC, US, World Tag, WWE Tag, and Divas/Women's. --UnquestionableTruth-- 05:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help on Eugene O'Neill conflict

As someone who has contributed to the Eugene O'Neill article, perhaps you would be willing to look at the (rather one-sided) discussion on that article's talk page regarding Emerson7's deletion of cited materials, Ah, Wilderness NOT O'Neill's only comedy. I would like to have a Request for Comment process initiated, but must have at least one other editor to have contributed to the discussion before an RfC can be started. Thank you. Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WMXXVI

The source contains confimation from the stadium's operating company, Global Spectrum. per WP:V WP:RS (third-party source) this source is acceptable--UnquestionableTruth-- 02:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to WP:PW.--UnquestionableTruth-- 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The stadium's operator confirmed the event in the source making any argument over the non-validity of the article baseless. Take it to WP:PW if you have any other concerns. --UnquestionableTruth-- 03:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The statement is in reference to the economic impact the event is expected to have on the region. --UnquestionableTruth-- 03:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done.--TRUCO 03:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do know this TJ. However, after 3 years knowing you and collaborating with you in this project, what I can't believe is... well, recently TJ I've found your lack of faith in me disturbing. Ha-ha. Just kidding. Humor aside though, seriously TJ, I know what your intentions were, and if it were me in your shoes I would have done the same thing and immediately revert something I found to be as sensitive as this due to the nature of wrestling sources. However after years of collaboration I assume we would know by now how each other thinks. Assume good faith TJ. Don't shut people out so quickly and instead work with them to come to an equal end.--UnquestionableTruth-- 04:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Flair

Not acccording to the WWE Championship article, which is what I based it on.

Flair won it in 1992, when, according to the WWE Championship article, it was the "WWF World Heavyweight Championship". ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 13:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I wouldn't know. Don't remember much of wrestling before 1997, so... *shrugs* I was just going by the article. If you want to change it back, feel free to. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TNA Wrestling Shoot Style Matches

Hey just a quick note to say I deleted the shoot style matches part on the TNA page because they discontinued them because they were unpopular with the fans so I thought it was an irrelevant part of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilagod101 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Save the Netbooks

Can you please identify specific problems with the Save the Netbooks article so as they can be resolved? The templates are to highlight areas that need cleanup, not to permanently brand articles people don't like - so far there have been very few issues identified and the subject is clearly notable. -- samj inout 22:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, given this is of ZERO benefit to me whatsoever, perhaps you could reconsider your 'delete' vote. Blatant advertising ("Pages that exclusively promote some entity and that would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic") is a basis for a delete vote but this content is definitely encyclopedic. -- samj inout 23:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NOE

I'm not eating any crow, because there was no indication that the name wouldn't have been either of the two. And none of the opposition was saying "well it could be something completely different." It was simply another change, and the articles should be reflected as such. Mshake3 (talk) 02:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not changing my habits. The consesus was formed with shitty reasoning, and I just cannot allow users with such terrible reasoning to make decisions around here. Mshake3 (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who the fuck is Luther Hall?

Seriously. Big Luth (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah...

...my bad for trying to make Wikipedia accurate. I forgot it was about egos, not articles. Big Luth (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, why do you want me banned? I've done nothing malicious. Petty. Big Luth (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest you actually concentrate on getting articles accurate first... Big Luth (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TJ_Spyke&oldid=273459379"