Talk:United Nations (gang)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I don't understand why this article was un-wikified... so I'm reverting it. If someone can explain why this was done, please do. Matthew Glennon (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this entry should be deleted, it reads like a poorly written tabloid article, nothing is cited —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.174.212 (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting rumours-but hardly wiki quality —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.103.168.63 (talk) 02:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The word on the street is that UN was behind it." Word on the street? Wikipedia isn't a rumor mill. 199.212.10.67 (talk) 06:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not wiki quality

I agree with the above poster who stated that this reads like a bad tabloid article. This UN gang article needs to be brief, sans all the minutiae. I'd do it myself, but I've never done a major wiki rewrite/edit before (only corrected spelling and grammar mistakes in the past). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.192.78 (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]