Jump to content

User talk:ZimZalaBim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Supersaiyan474 (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 8 March 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:ZimZalaBim.
My current status is: Mostly just monitoring recent changes

Us Now

I'm new to Wikipedia and have spent the last few days trying to make the best possible article on the Us Now documentary. I would appreciate your feedback in order to achieve this.

Why is a review in the Financial Times not enough for Verification? This film has also been reviewed by Channel 4, the Sheffield Doc fest (one of the biggest in the world) and a number of leading political thinkers. Please find a sample of the reviews here: http://blog.usnowfilm.com/2008/12/film-reviews/

Us Now has been screened in London at the Royal Society for the Arts, all over Canada to more than 5000 people and Oslo, Paris, Washington, Haifa (Israel) etc... Is this not enough as far as notability goes?

I have read and understood the wikipedia policy and am determined to comply with it. I would appreciate if you could give me a few tips in order to overcome the prospect of having this page deleted. Thanks. Halfamatan (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My reasoning for nominating the article for deletion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Us Now, where you can participate and make your voice heard. --ZimZalaBim talk 01:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. ~~~~

Bullzeye contribs 03:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you're a regular, then you should know better in the first place than to paste a lengthy commentary about the nature of chimps on an article's talk page. --ZimZalaBim talk 03:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Opinions are like rectums, friend. A simple redaction of the text that offended you would have sufficed, but since you are clearly upset, I offer my apologies, per WP:AGF. In the future, I'd appreciate the same personal courtesy instead of a Twinkle template message like I've been leaving for vandals for about 3 years now. Thanks! :) Bullzeye contribs 04:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brady Quinn

want to check the article - we reverted at same time, and I ended up in the wrong. Thankx — Ched ~ (yes?) 02:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've already fixed it. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim talk 02:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your consideration and comment please

Hello ZZB- please will you consider this thread on my talk page and give me your opinions?--VS talk 07:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hulu

Hello ZZB,

I recently added a line in the history section of Hulu which you immediately removed (given your deletion, I will not reiterate the statement here; the history page will identify the sentence in question as my only edit for the page). I am fairly new to Wiki and thus, was just wondering why a statement that contains an authentic reference (Newsweek magazine and others that I did not get a chance to post) was deleted from the page? I just want to understand the justification behind the removal of the statement so that I do not repeat the same mistake in the future. Thank you. Wiki emma johnson (talk) 06:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I only saw your initial edit [1], which didn't include a citation, and thus, appeared to be unconstructive. As I was clicking to revert that edit, you must've completed your second edit, which included the citation. My revert inadvertently caught both edits. I'll revert back to include your inclusion with citation. --ZimZalaBim talk 13:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ebay

Ok, one article was deleted due to being web content, why not Ebay? --Wikiapples (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, don't be disruptive and add deletion tags just because one of your articles (Sock geek) was deleted. Second, please read the notice that was placed on your page regarding the deletion of that article, especially as it relates to our notability requirements for web-related content and companies. --ZimZalaBim talk 14:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

message

U gave me that messege about reverting my etid just note that i dont care i hate wikipedia, they wont make me admin and keep blocking my ip even if i dont use it

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZimZalaBim&oldid=275800817"