Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Taormina

Angel Taormina

According to Officemailrt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), this article lacks any verifiable sources. Removing those statements that use the sources leaves us with an empty article. Apparently she's got a couple of self-produced short films and a book or two, but it all looks like it's self-promoting. It's hard to find anything on Google that's not an advertisement for her in one way or another. I'd say this person fails WP:N. Matt (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete working on first feature length film, apparently not yet notable. I wouldnt however rely on opinions from Officemailrt, a single purpose account who seems to have tried repeatedly to blank what sources there are: the article history & his contributions are quite illuminating. DGG (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is plenty of documentation as to the invaluable contribution Ms Taormina has made in the development of the interpretation of the cabaletta, Quando rapito in estasi. Unfortunately, Ms Taormina's detractors would have her removed from this site, but one is confident that reason will prevail. The Gazzetta di Modena is far from a promotional tool. It is a legitimate source of information, though in Italian, it is true. Should it be excluded on this basis? That would be a grave mistake indeed, and an injustice unworthy of Wikipedia, to be sure.