Jump to content

User talk:Jordan 1972

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OzWoden (talk | contribs) at 23:31, 17 March 2009 (→Image:IHSANOGLU_(16).jpg deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Re. Page semi-protection

Hello. I've re-protected the article for one month. Hopefully that shall suffice. Regards, Húsönd 00:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tin-glazed pottery

Try asking User:VAwebteam to see if there's something in the V&A. Ty 02:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can upload an image if it's still required - plate, candlestick or bottle? VAwebteam (talk) 07:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Conti-sig.png

I don't really need the image anymore, so it could just as well be deleted. It's a small version of the BDSM Emblem. --Conti|✉ 14:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Morwen.jpg

I think it's a copyvio. You can delete it. -- Tim Starling (talk) 00:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image licensing

Hi, thanks for your message about the license on Image:Mammillaria.jpg. I was still fairly new when I uploaded it back in 2005 and chose the wrong tag, but it seems to have slipped through the net of image tags which I keep up to date from time to time. If you spot any more of mine that seem to be wrong please let me know.

Although the image is no longer on the Cactus article (such is the way of a wiki), it does still feature from time to time on my user page. I do still need this image and my sub page. If not, I'd just delete them myself. --Cactus.man ✍ 08:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palanga

Palanga pic on my user page duly released per your request. Sca (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spencer-Peirce-Little Farm (rear) - Newbury, Massachusetts.JPG

Thanks very much for the friendly note. I have added licensing info (public domain by self). Much obliged - Daderot (talk) 19:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image at Central pulpit

You wrote on the talk page of this article that the photo was not satisfactorily licensed. Can you explain to me what WOULD be satisfactorally licensed. The info page for this photo clearly says that it was taken by a wikipedian who uploaded it himself. --Doric Loon (talk) 22:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. The user is my son - he is not active, but could certainly log in to add a sentence if I ask him to. Is there a preferred formulation? I've found in the past that if the correct legal wording is not used, people scream, but hey, us ordinary folks can't find our way through that! --Doric Loon (talk) 12:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:Relics khajuraho.jpg

Please let me know about these two things:

  • What is needed from the organization (Berger Foundation) which gave me the permission originaly on October 13, 2005 to use the image?
  • What tag should be used?

Thanks.--Malaiya (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

clarification, please

Please, what do you mean by this?:

"...if the request for permission simply asked if the image could be used on the article; if so, the image is not free enough."

Jclerman (talk) 08:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Image tag removal

sorry, thought the image would disappear too...andycjp (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by User:Seniors.olac

Please mind your own articles!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seniors.olac (talk • contribs) 12:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative works

Mind linking to the WP policy that images must permit derivative works? Because I think folks may have been misinterpreting it & I'd like to read the history behind it for myself. Crypticfirefly (talk) 00:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joelporter

As much as I am for keeping user pages of even the most mildly active users, no matter how self-promotional, the key fact that appears to have been missed is that this editor has precisely one (1) edit to his credit, that edit was to create the self-promotional user page, and it was created on 31 October 2007. So that nomination came exactly one year and ten minutes after it was created. I'm not clear on the review process for MfD but it might be worth revisiting this decision. - Dravecky (talk) 14:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resumes

Thanks. I'll get to it straight away. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gettysburg Mason Memorial

The reason why I tagged Gettysburg Mason Memorial as such is because 1) to keep better track on what is available for use on WP, and 2) because I have had images gone forever because they got moved from en. to commons, and then got deleted in commons; if they stay on en., then I've got a warning.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 02:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

More than happy for my orphaned images from November 06 to be tagged for deletion. I believe I tried unsuccessfully to do this before and had some problems with the coding - any chance you could do it for me? Cheers, Skarloey (talk) 15:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Prod on Kurt Klang, listed at AfD instead

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that while doing proposed deletion patrol, I came across an article that you had proposed for deletion, Kurt Klang. Looking at the history, proposed deletion was already done, back in April of 06 but was contested on April 14th and 16th. It was easy to miss, the only reason I noticed this was when the prodder complained about the prod being removed in a later edit summary around that time. Due to deletion rules, previously contested proposed deletions can't go to proposed deletion again, so I removed your proposed deletion and sent it to Articles for deletion instead. The deletion discussion can be found here. Raven1977 (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested

Please comment at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AnomieBOT 11, as you commented on a similar proposal at WT:IFD. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 03:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Please take the picture you posted about on my userpage down ASAP. I have no clue how it has not been taken down after 2.5 years and a police investigation. Smartyllama (talk) 14:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chalet Marplatense

There is already another identic image from Commons, this one should go. By the way, the pic was taken by myself in 2005. Thanks.--Darius (talk) 15:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Canada_Memorial_-_war_memorial_in_Green_Park,_London_-_Pierre_Granche.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Canada_Memorial_-_war_memorial_in_Green_Park,_London_-_Pierre_Granche.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

orphan image deletion tagging

Before nominating things with "insufficient info...", check the uploader's contribution history. In general, they add the image to an article right after uploading it, and that can tell you what the image is of. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, where are you getting your lists of images to go through? Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMG_07291.jpg nomination

What is the deal about deleting my Molde-picture? At least justify it. It is my picture. --Sparviere (talk) 20:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion

Please note that if two or more images are the same, you should not delete the largest one, only the smaller ones. Stifle (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

You deleted two diagrams specially designed and created for the Phase distortion synthesis article and licensed for that purpose. What is your problem??? MX44 (talk) 00:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMG_8275.JPG listed for deletion

Image:Sint-Truiden.jpgIt seems to be one I uploaded before I'd named it, back before I'd really figured out how things work with wiki-images. I appear to have replicated it with this one, so deleting the one identified by nothing more helpful than a number for a name would make sense. Regards Charles01 (talk) 06:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IHSANOGLU_(16).jpg deletion

Whilst I do not have a problem with the image's deletion, I do have a problem with your poorly substantiated assumption that it was "lifted from a website" as that assumption is not true. Don't assume - it is a bad habit. OzWoden (talk) 07:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_November_28#Image:IHSANOGLU_.2816.29.jpg, and no where do I make an assumption that it was lifted from a website. Don't quote something that doesn't exits - it is a bad habit. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. I had meant the image "1.12 Image:Ihs_graffiti.jpg" which was immediately above the one noted above. My original comment stands, with reference to the image Ihs_graffiti.jpg. The discussion in which you made the assumption is here, http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=File:Ihs_graffiti.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1. OzWoden (talk)

I Dream of Flight image

I own the photo and am happy to put up whatever information will make it okay for Wikipedia. Can you please let me know exactly what block of text I need to paste to make it clear that I'm letting wikipedia use it, under GFDL guidelines, or whatever? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabarry (talk • contribs) 01:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VVoice march cover.jpg

I deleted the image. Thanks very much for catching it, I'd totally forgotten about it! Steven Walling (talk) 02:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gas Fired Power Plant

Hi Jason, I would like this image moved over to Wikipedia Commons rather than deleted. It is orphaned right now but could be linked to other articles in the future. It could also be grouped with other types of energy generation plants types from coal to wind farms. I understand it is not the highest quality of pictures. But it is a start. Please let me kown what you thinkd Staplegunther (talk)

Talkback

Hello, Jordan 1972. You have new messages at Astatine-210's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

astatine-210 discovered elements ∞ what am I? 23:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jordan_1972&oldid=277983362"