User talk:128.122.193.222

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice
• The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
• Your own user page
• Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
• The ability to rename pages
• The ability to upload images
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
• The eligibility to become an administrator
• The right to be heard in votes and elections
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a Wikipedian! --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Christian Supremacy

I'd like you to add citations of works that define this concept and distinguish it from both evangelicalism and triumphalism. Then we can be sure it's not original research. Thanks. Gazpacho 20:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

It's closely related to the two pages it references, Dominionism and Christian Reconstructionism, but I don't understand how to provide citations if the page is already gone. Triumphalism is much more general, and Evangelicalism is not the same thing. Any simple google search of the term indicates that it is not a term I've coined, but one in widespread use among both the left and right.

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

Blocked by whom, and for what?

Reply:

Blocked by whom, and for what?

Hi. Blocked by me only for a short time. Someone on this proxy was creating a slew of titles relating to Buddhism with nothing more in them than category links. No text whatsoever. It was meant as a way to stem the tide of these entries long enough to clean them up. You should be OK to edit now. Sorry about the inconvenience. - Lucky 6.9 19:00, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

---

That was me - didn't realize that was frowned upon. My thinking was - post them and they shall be fleshed out. Is this no good? Also, curious as to why the edits on the Sakyong's page were reverted.

Well, yes and no. You can certainly post short articles, but they have to have some content. In other words, write a good, short article and hang a stub notice, like the Buddhism stub. I reverted a couple of your edits without looking after seeing a couple of questionable ones, I'm afraid. If what you added was legitimate, by all means feel free to replace it. Take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of style to learn more. Also, please consider establishing a user account. It's a lot of fun! - Lucky 6.9 19:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- JoanneB 15:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

---