Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary Domain Controller
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MBisanz (talk | contribs) at 05:49, 24 March 2009 (Closing debate, result was keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 05:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Primary Domain Controller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No refs ever, no significant change since June 2005. Never had refs; badly written. Minor vandalism and a bit of linkspam. I'd love to see it improved, but if it's not happened in 4 years, it's not likely to suddenly come to life. Unless this process awakens input. Chzz ► 14:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, and suggest early close: I don't see any grounds for actually deleting this. This seems to be a somewhat obsolete concept in Windows network architecture, and as such a worthy subject. It may not be a priority for anyone now, but fortunately, there is no deadline. Reference standards were much more lax in 2005, and failure to comply with current standards is not a good reason to delete any article, especially one that has been here for a long time. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - "If [an] article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD". — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per LinguistAtLarge, and the even more explicit statement of the same concept at WP:DELETION: "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." I see no reason this page cannot be improved to address the cncerns stated by the nominator. JulesH (talk) 19:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow keep per Linguist. I seem to be saying that a lot today.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 20:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.