User talk:208.82.225.245
Could you politely describe what needs to be cited that isn't? The National Register list, Park Service structures list and the NRHP nom are all cited in a four-sentence article. Acroterion (talk) 01:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Having read the comment on the talk page, I gather that you question the significance of the lookout? Consensus is that listing on the National Register of Historic Places inherently confers notability. Given that, no citation is needed to back that up. This is a very minor NRHP property, of that there is no doubt. My apologies for characterizing the tag in that manner, but drive-by tagging is a plague: it's essential that you describe what you'd like to see, and "drive-by" is the common expression for apparently inappropriate cite tags. Acroterion (talk) 01:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Xasodfuih. Thank you. Nja247 07:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |