Jump to content

Talk:Paradox of analysis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kim1220 (talk | contribs) at 03:50, 25 March 2009 (←Created page with 'This was interesting topic. Overall, I think you have a good start on your article. Great job on giving some of examples of 'paradox of analysis'. I didn't get t…'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This was interesting topic. Overall, I think you have a good start on your article. Great job on giving some of examples of 'paradox of analysis'. I didn't get this analysis at first but after I read some of examples, I clearly understood about this topic. One of the resource page was from 'The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy' which gave me some credibility. Also it presents information in an well objective manner includes all sides of an issue represented. If you were looking to add length to your article, you could summarize Plato's Meno breifly. Other than, I can't think of anything to expand. I find few articles that are related with your topic. You might find other informations to expand. Overall, great job~

1. Title: Analysis, Language, and Concepts: The Second Paradox of Analysis by Felicia Ackerman http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/sici?sici=1520-8583%281990%294%3A%3C535%3AALACTSPOA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-1&origin=serialsolutions&cookieSet=1

2. Title: The Paradox of Analysis by Richard A. Fumerton http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/stable/2107643?seq=

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Paradox_of_analysis&oldid=279514986"