Talk:Nuclear envelope

Template:Wikiproject MCB I moved part of the paragraph on the nuclear lamina to the actual nuclear lamina article. There's also the possibility of redirecting the nuclear lamina article to this one...--Kinglz 21:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I wouldn't redirect nuclear lamina to nuclear envelope, based on the fact that only the animal nuclear envelope has a true nuclear lamina. Also, this article is completely missing information on the plant nuclear envelope, e.g. its role as MTOC in mitosis. - tameeria 01:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my school, the textbook calls it "the nuclear membrane," so I was thinking if we should change it. User:yctaabpjic 10:40 10 October —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.84.233 (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the professional level, the term "nuclear envelope" is preferred, really. There is already, however, a redirect from nuclear membrane. – Clockwork Soul 16:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do variation of the thinckness of leaves makes them fit or suvive easily in the environment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.185.7 (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ghdsfdghdshgdchffdcjgdjgfs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.92.245.12 (talk) 02:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page references a non-existent electron micrograph of the envelope. I'm going to remove it for now, if someone has the micrograph and wants to add it back in please do. Wingedkat (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]